TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER WITH HIGH FAT CONTENT EMPLOYING AN ENZYME POOL AND BIOSURFACTANT: TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

ABSTRACT The combination of 0.5% weight per volume (w/v) crude enzyme consortia produced by solid state fermentation with Penicillium brevicompactum and 27 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by submerged fermentation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was employed to pretreat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Damasceno, Fernanda R. C., Cavalcanti-Oliveira, Elisa D., Kookos, Ioannis K., Apostolis A. Koutinas, Cammarota, Magali C., Freire, Denise M. G.
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT The combination of 0.5% weight per volume (w/v) crude enzyme consortia produced by solid state fermentation with Penicillium brevicompactum and 27 milligrams per liter (mg/L) of rhamnolipid biosurfactant produced by submerged fermentation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was employed to pretreat wastewater from a poultry slaughterhouse in bench upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) bioreactors. One bioreactor was fed with untreated wastewater (Control) and another with pretreated wastewater (Test). Under an organic loading rate of 11 kg COD/m3.d, the Test bioreactor showed higher specific methane production (67.8 mL CH4 (STP)/g COD removed), higher chemical oxygen demand (COD) (91.2%), and oil and grease (O&G) (95.8%) removal than the Control bioreactor, which produced 36.1 - 16.9 mL CH4 (STP)/g COD removed with 72.5% COD removal and 48% O&G removal. The Control bioreactor experienced five clogging episodes due to the accumulation of fat on the surface, while the Test bioreactor operated without operational problems. The scum of the Control bioreactor contained more than 10 times higher quantities of fat than the Test bioreactor. The economic analysis indicated that such alternative technology has lower costs than conventional technology.
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.7185377