An updated evaluation of reported no-observed adverse effect levels for chrysotile asbestos for lung cancer and mesothelioma
Although consumption of chrysotile asbestos has decreased since the 1970s, the latency period of asbestos-related cancers is thought to be at least 20–30 years, and therefore the potential health risks associated with historical exposures is still actively researched. This analysis represents an upd...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although consumption of chrysotile asbestos has decreased since the 1970s, the latency period of asbestos-related cancers is thought to be at least 20–30 years, and therefore the potential health risks associated with historical exposures is still actively researched. This analysis represents an update to a previous paper in which we evaluated the exposure–response relationships for lung cancer and mesothelioma in chrysotile-exposed cohorts. Here, we review several recently published studies as well as updated information from previous studies. For each of the 14 studies considered, we identified the “no-observed adverse effect level” (NOAEL) for lung cancer and/or mesothelioma. NOAEL values for lung cancer ranged from 1.1 to |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.3144910 |