Additional file 1 of Distinct cervical tissue-adherent and luminal microbiome communities correlate with mucosal host gene expression and protein levels in Kenyan sex workers

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Abundance distribution of individual taxa in the luminal and tissue microbiome data sets. Violin plots showing the distribution of relative abundance of the top 30 most abundant taxa in the luminal and tissue-adherent data sets. Supplementary Figure 2. Diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Edfeldt, Gabriella, Kaldhusdal, Vilde, Czarnewski, Paulo, Bradley, Frideborg, Bergström, Sofia, Lajoie, Julie, Xu, Jiawu, Månberg, Anna, Kimani, Joshua, Oyugi, Julius, Nilsson, Peter, Tjernlund, Annelie, Fowke, Keith R., Kwon, Douglas S., Broliden, Kristina
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1. Abundance distribution of individual taxa in the luminal and tissue microbiome data sets. Violin plots showing the distribution of relative abundance of the top 30 most abundant taxa in the luminal and tissue-adherent data sets. Supplementary Figure 2. Differential bacterial abundance across the luminal and tissue microbiome datasets. Differential bacterial abundance was compared between the luminal and tissue-adherent microbiome data sets. The results are shown as a) dot plots, and b) bar plots, respectively. Bacteria with log2FC above 0.25 and p-value < 0.01 (from the Wilcoxon’s test) were considered significantly different and were sorted by the highest expression. The color scale indicates the difference in total abundance between the datasets as a proportion, where “max” is the highest abundance of the two datasets, and the other becomes a proportion of this value. The size of the dots indicates the average abundance of the given bacteria in the given data set. Supplementary Figure 3. Summary of pairwise comparisons between the study groups for differentially expressed genes, GO and KEGG pathways as well as PPI analysis. The results are shown as: a) Summary of pairwise comparison between the luminal study groups, and for the b) tissue-based study groups. For both a) and b): The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (p
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.26579483