Comparing Elicit AI Research Assistant to PubMed and CINAHL Complete
The data represents the comparison of Elicit: The AI Research Assistant to PubMed and CINAHL Complete. A descriptive study design was used for graduate nursing students at a large southern Alabama university college of nursing to compare the effectiveness of a GenAI literature search tool, Elicit: T...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The data represents the comparison of Elicit: The AI Research Assistant to PubMed and CINAHL Complete. A descriptive study design was used for graduate nursing students at a large southern Alabama university college of nursing to compare the effectiveness of a GenAI literature search tool, Elicit: The AI Research Assistant, to PubMed and CINAHL. A two-phase framework was utilized to organize complex information and justify a preference. A rubric was designed to promote and assess critical thinking through inquiry-based learning in educating graduate nursing students on information literacy and structuring a literature search. Discovering a relationship between the search tools, students identified the strengths (pros) and weaknesses (cons) of each tool and determined which tool was more effective in terms of accuracy, relevance and efficiency. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.6084/m9.figshare.26081965 |