Shaped by their environment: variation in blue whale morphology across three productive coastal ecosystems

Shaped by their environment: variation in blue whale morphology across three productive coastal ecosystemsDawn R. Barlow1*, K.C. Bierlich1, William K. Oestreich2, Gustavo Chiang3, John W. Durban4, Jeremy A. Goldbogen5, David W. Johnston6, Matthew S. Leslie7, Michael Moore8, John P. Ryan2, Leigh G. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Barlow, Dawn, Bierlich, KC, Oestreich, William K., Chiang, Gustavo, Durban, John W., Goldbogen, Jeremy, Johnston, David W., Leslie, Matthew S., Moore, Michael J., Ryan, John, Torres, Leigh
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Shaped by their environment: variation in blue whale morphology across three productive coastal ecosystemsDawn R. Barlow1*, K.C. Bierlich1, William K. Oestreich2, Gustavo Chiang3, John W. Durban4, Jeremy A. Goldbogen5, David W. Johnston6, Matthew S. Leslie7, Michael Moore8, John P. Ryan2, Leigh G. Torres11Geospatial Ecology of Marine Megafauna Lab, Marine Mammal Institute, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon USA2Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, California, USA3Centro de Investigación para la Sustentabilidad (CIS) & Departamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile4Marine Mammal Institute, Oregon State University, Newport, Oregon, USA5Hopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California, USA6Division of Marine Science and Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA7 National Climate Adaptation Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA8Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA*dawn.barlow@oregonstate.eduAbstract: Species ecology and life history patterns are often reflected in animal morphology. Blue whales are globally distributed, with distinct populations that feed in different productive coastal regions worldwide. Thus, they provide an opportunity to investigate how regional ecosystem characteristics may drive morphological differences within a species. Here, we compare physical and biological oceanography of three different blue whale foraging grounds: (1) Monterey Bay, California, USA, (2) the South Taranaki Bight (STB), New Zealand, and (3) the Corcovado Gulf, Chile. Additionally, we compare the morphology of blue whales from these regions using unoccupied aircraft imagery. Monterey Bay and the Corcovado Gulf are seasonally productive and support the migratory life history strategy of the Eastern North Pacific (ENP) and Chilean blue whale populations, respectively. In contrast, the New Zealand blue whale population remains in the less productive STB year-round. All three populations were indistinguishable in total body length. However, New Zealand blue whales were in significantly higher body condition despite lower regional productivity, potentially attributable to their non-migratory strategy that facilitates lower risk of spatiotemporal misal
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.24282724