Supplementary Material for: Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab for the management of patients with hepatocellular cancer in the first-line setting: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Background & aims: The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare randomised controlled trial evidence for atezolizumab-bevacizumab with globally relevant pharmacological comparators for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable he...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: A., Vogel, R.S., Finn, M.-H., BlanchetZumofen, C., Heuser, J., SanchezAlvarez, M., Leibfried, C.R., Mitchell, S., Batson, G., Redhead, V.E., Gaillard, M., Kudo
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background & aims: The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare randomised controlled trial evidence for atezolizumab-bevacizumab with globally relevant pharmacological comparators for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Randomised controlled trials investigating first-line treatment of HCC in adults with no prior systemic treatment were eligible for inclusion into the SLR and were retrieved from Embase, MEDLINE, and Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) Reviews. Interventions of interest for the NMA included atezolizumab-bevacizumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, durvalumab (including in combination with tremelimumab), cabozantinib (including in combination with atezolizumab), camrelizumab (including in combination with rivoceranib), pembrolizumab (including in combination with lenvatinib) and tislelizumab. Random effects NMA was conducted for survival endpoints within a Bayesian framework with an informative prior distribution for between study heterogeneity. The hazard ratios for relative treatment effect were estimated with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Results: The SLR identified 49 studies, of which eight formed a connected evidence network permitting the indirect treatment comparison of atezolizumab-bevacizumab with comparators of interest. The indirect comparisons suggested an improved overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus most comparators. All indirect treatment comparison results for atezolizumab-bevacizumab included the null value within the 95% CrI (n=1) for OS and progression free survival (PFS). Conclusions: The results of the NMA indicate atezolizumab-bevacizumab is associated with superior or comparable OS and PFS together with a manageable safety profile compared with globally relevant comparators in the unresected HCC indication. The findings support that atezolizumab-bevacizumab remains standard of care for the management of first-line unresectable HCC patients.
DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.23802972