Preconditioned implicit time integration schemes for Maxwell’s equations on locally refined grids

In this paper, we consider an efficient implementation of higher-order implicit time integration schemes for spatially discretized linear Maxwell’s equations on locally refined meshes. In particular, our interest is in problems where only a few of the mesh elements are small while the majority of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hochbruck, Marlis, Köhler, Jonas, Kumbhar, Pratik M.
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, we consider an efficient implementation of higher-order implicit time integration schemes for spatially discretized linear Maxwell’s equations on locally refined meshes. In particular, our interest is in problems where only a few of the mesh elements are small while the majority of the elements is much larger. We suggest to approximate the solution of the linear systems arising in each time step by a preconditioned Krylov subspace method, e.g., the quasi-minimal residual method by Freund and Nachtigal [13]. Motivated by the analysis of locally implicit methods by Hochbruck and Sturm [25], we show how to construct a preconditioner in such a way that the number of iterations required by the Krylov subspace method to achieve a certain accuracy is bounded independently of the diameter of the small mesh elements. We prove this behavior by using Faber polynomials and complex approximation theory. The cost to apply the preconditioner consists of the solution of a small linear system, whose dimension corresponds to the degrees of freedom within the fine part of the mesh (and its next coarse neighbors). If this dimension is small compared to the size of the full mesh, the preconditioner is very efficient. We conclude by verifying our theoretical results with numerical experiments for the fourth-order Gauß-Legendre Runge–Kutta method.
DOI:10.5445/ir/1000148078