Fig. 2 in A coalescent-based estimator of genetic drift, and acoustic divergence in the Pteronotus parnellii species complex
Fig. 2 Echolocation call frequency by island by sex and its relation to mass on the call frequency (F(1, 49) = 0.435, P value = 0.512). The body dimensions. a Boxplots of echolocation frequency (summarizing 95% HPD of population differences in means for body mass was 10 calls/individual). Bayesian 9...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Bild |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Fig. 2 Echolocation call frequency by island by sex and its relation to mass on the call frequency (F(1, 49) = 0.435, P value = 0.512). The body dimensions. a Boxplots of echolocation frequency (summarizing 95% HPD of population differences in means for body mass was 10 calls/individual). Bayesian 95% high-probability density (HPD) of 0.89–2.29 g. c Call frequency as a function of forearm length. Anathe difference in call frequency means between Puerto Rico and Hislyses of covariance support little influence of forearm length on the call paniola was 5.2–6.0 kHz. b Call frequency as a function of body mass. frequency (F(1, 52) = 2.851, P value = 0.097). The 95% HPD of Analyses of covariance support very different call frequency for island population differences in means for forearm lengths was −1.82, groups (F(1, 49) = 704.260, P value = 0.000), but no influence of body 0.422 mm |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5281/zenodo.7845699 |