Data from Yellow Sigatoka monitoring methods in the subtropical climate of southern Brazil

Description of the data and file structure In this study four methods of disease monitoring were tested under field conditions: Biological Pre Warning (BPW); Stage of Evolution (SE); youngest Leaf Spotted (YLS); Infection Index (II). The BPW system evaluates the youngest leaves (2, 3, and 4), assign...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Peruch, Luiz, Sonego, Márcio, Bonfim Junior, Mauro Ferreira, Sangaleti, Tarinks
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Description of the data and file structure In this study four methods of disease monitoring were tested under field conditions: Biological Pre Warning (BPW); Stage of Evolution (SE); youngest Leaf Spotted (YLS); Infection Index (II). The BPW system evaluates the youngest leaves (2, 3, and 4), assigning a value for each type of lesion present, as well as for intensity of the lesion on the leaves (BUREAU et al., 1992). In the dataset is cited as the variable gross sum (points). The SE evaluates more leaves (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) and scores only the most advanced symptoms of leaf disease, but without considering lesion intensity (GANRY et al., 2008). The SE calculation also corrects the gross sum of the disease according to leaf emission. The leaf emission rate was calculated using the Brun scale, which evaluates cigar leaf growth in decimals from 0.0 to 0.8.  In the dataset is cited as the variable corrected gross sum (points). YLS is evaluated as the first leaf that has 10 spots with gray centers (CARLIER et al., 2003).  In the dataset is cited as the variable YLS, which means the leaf position counted from the top to the botton of the plant (leaf number 3, leaf number 4...). Sigatoka Infection Index is quantified by assessing the severity of banana leaf disease using the Stover scale, with indexes from 0 to 50%, by means of the following formula: Infection Index =% (IF): [Σn × b / (N- 1) × T] × 100, in which: n = the number of leaves at each Stover scale level; b = degree according to the scale; N = the number of degrees employed in the scale (6); T = the total number of leaves evaluated (CARLIER et al., 2003).  In the dataset is cited as the variable Infection index that should be understood like the severity of this leaf disease. In the second phase of the study, two monitoring methods were applied in commercial orchards in order to compare the standard model (Biological Pre-Warning – BPW) with the alternative method selected in the experimental phase (Youngest Leaf Spotted – YLS). The methods were applied, as described before in three sites in Criciúma (site 1) and Siderópolis (sites 2 e 3), municipalities in the southern coast of the state of Santa Catarina, from March 2016 to November 2018. During this period, 37 disease evaluations were performed at each location. Disease data of the experimental area were submitted to descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation at 5% probability of error. Disease progress curves were also plotted. The disease developm
ISSN:2525-6076
2525-6076
DOI:10.5281/zenodo.14260276