Marmot mass gain rates relate to their group’s social structure
Mass gain is an important fitness correlate for survival in highly seasonal species. While many physiological, genetic, life history, and environmental factors can influence mass gain, more recent work suggests the specific nature of an individual’s own social relationships also influences mass gain...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Mass gain is an important fitness correlate for survival in highly
seasonal species. While many physiological, genetic, life history, and
environmental factors can influence mass gain, more recent work suggests
the specific nature of an individual’s own social relationships also
influences mass gain. However, less is known about consequences of social
structure for individuals. We studied the association between social
structure, quantified via social network analysis, and annual mass gain in
yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventer). Social networks were
constructed from 31,738 social interactions between 671 individuals in 125
social groups from 2002 to 2018. Using a refined dataset of 1,022
observations across 587 individuals in 81 social groups, we fitted linear
mixed models to analyze the relationship between attributes of social
structure and individual mass gain. We found that individuals residing in
more connected and unbreakable social groups tended to gain proportionally
less mass. However, these results were largely age dependent. Adults, who
form the core of marmot social groups, residing in more spread apart
networks had greater mass gain than those in tighter networks. Yearlings,
involved in a majority of social interactions, and those who resided in
socially homogeneous and stable groups had greater mass gain. These
results show how the structure of the social group an individual resides
in may have consequences for a key fitness correlate. But, importantly,
this relationship was age-dependent. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5068/d1x38h |