Data from: Thermal adaptation best explains Bergmann's and Allen's rule across ecologically diverse shorebirds
Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules state that endotherms should be larger and have shorter appendages in cooler climates. However, the drivers of these rules are not clear. Both rules could be explained by adaptation for improved thermoregulation, including plastic responses to temperature in early life....
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules state that endotherms should be larger and
have shorter appendages in cooler climates. However, the drivers of these
rules are not clear. Both rules could be explained by adaptation for
improved thermoregulation, including plastic responses to temperature in
early life. Non-thermal explanations are also plausible as climate impacts
other factors that influence size and shape, including starvation risk,
predation risk, and foraging ecology. We assess the potential drivers of
Bergmann’s and Allen’s rules in 30 shorebird species using extensive field
data (>200,000 observations). We show birds in hot, tropical
northern Australia have longer bills and smaller bodies than conspecifics
in temperate, southern Australia, conforming with both ecogeographical
rules. This pattern is consistent across ecologically diverse species,
including migratory birds that spend early life in the Arctic. Our
findings best support the hypothesis that thermoregulatory adaptation to
warm climates drives latitudinal patterns in shorebird size and shape. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.xsj3tx9j5 |