Ungulate spatiotemporal responses to contrasting predation risk from wolves and snow leopards
Spatial responses to risk from multiple predators can precipitate emergent consequences for prey (i.e., multiple-predator effects, MPEs) and mediate indirect interactions between predators. How prey navigate risk from multiple predators may therefore have important ramifications for understanding th...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Spatial responses to risk from multiple predators can precipitate emergent
consequences for prey (i.e., multiple-predator effects, MPEs) and mediate
indirect interactions between predators. How prey navigate risk from
multiple predators may therefore have important ramifications for
understanding the propagation of predation-risk effects (PREs) through
ecosystems. The interaction of predator and prey traits has emerged as a
potentially key driver of anti-predator behaviour but remains
underexplored in large vertebrate systems, particularly where sympatric
prey share multiple predators. We sought to better generalize our
understanding of how predators influence their ecosystems by considering
how multiple sources of contingency drive prey distribution in a
multi-predator-multi-prey system. Specifically, we explored how two
sympatric ungulates with different escape tactics – vertically agile,
scrambling ibex (Capra sibirica) and sprinting argali (Ovis ammon) –
responded to predation risk from shared predators with contrasting hunting
modes – cursorial wolves (Canis lupus) and vertical-ambushing, stalking
snow leopards (Panthera uncia). Contrasting risk posed by the two
predators presented prey with clear trade-offs. Ibex selected for greater
exposure to chronic long-term risk from snow leopards, and argali for
wolves, in a nearly symmetrical manner that was predictable based on the
compatibility of their respective traits. Yet, acute short-term risk from
the same predator upended these long-term strategies, increasing each
ungulate’s exposure to risk from the alternate predator in a manner
consistent with a scenario in which conflicting anti-predator behaviours
precipitate risk-enhancing MPEs and mediate predator facilitation. By
contrast, reactive responses to wolves led ibex to reduce their exposure
to risk from both predators – a risk-reducing MPE. Evidence of a similar
reactive risk-reducing effect for argali vis-à-vis snow leopards was
lacking. Our results suggest that prey spatial responses and any resulting
MPEs and prey-mediated interactions between predators are contingent on
the interplay of hunting mode and escape tactics. Further investigation of
interactions among various drivers of contingency in PREs will contribute
to a more comprehensive understanding and improved forecasting of the
ecological effects of predators. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.tb2rbp044 |