Data from: Divergence in pollen performance between Clarkia sister species with contrasting mating systems supports predictions of sexual selection
Animal taxa that differ in the intensity of sperm competition often differ in sperm production or swimming speed, arguably due to sexual selection on postcopulatory male traits affecting siring success. In plants, closely related self- and cross-pollinated taxa similarly differ in the opportunity fo...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Animal taxa that differ in the intensity of sperm competition often differ
in sperm production or swimming speed, arguably due to sexual selection on
postcopulatory male traits affecting siring success. In plants, closely
related self- and cross-pollinated taxa similarly differ in the
opportunity for sexual selection among male gametophytes after
pollination, so traits such as the proportion of pollen on the stigma that
rapidly enters the style and mean pollen tube growth rate (PTGR) are
predicted to diverge between them. To date, no studies have tested this
prediction in multiple plant populations under uniform conditions. We
tested for differences in pollen performance in greenhouse-raised
populations of two Clarkia sister species: the predominantly outcrossing
C. unguiculata and the facultatively self-pollinating C. exilis. Within
populations of each taxon, groups of individuals were reciprocally
pollinated (n = 1153 pollinations) and their styles examined four hours
later. We tested for the effects of species, population, pollen type (self
vs. outcross), the number of competing pollen grains, and temperature on
pollen performance. Clarkia unguiculata exhibited higher mean PTGR than C.
exilis; pollen type had no effect on performance in either taxon. The
difference between these species in PTGR is consistent with predictions of
sexual selection theory. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.qs4nh |