Postnatal growth rate varies with latitude in range-expanding geese – the role of plasticity and day length
This dataset contains data from an analysis of differences in growth rate among three different barnacle populations breeding at different latitudes, described in the paper: Boom, Michiel P., van der Jeugd, H.P., Steffani, B., Nolet, B.A., Larsson, K., & Eichhorn, G. (2021), Postnatal growth rat...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This dataset contains data from an analysis of differences in growth rate
among three different barnacle populations breeding at different
latitudes, described in the paper: Boom, Michiel P., van der Jeugd, H.P.,
Steffani, B., Nolet, B.A., Larsson, K., & Eichhorn, G. (2021),
Postnatal growth rate varies with latitude in range-expanding geese – the
role of plasticity and day length. Journal of Animal Ecology. The
postnatal growth period is a crucial life stage, with potential lifelong
effects on an animal’s fitness. How fast animals grow depends on their
life history strategy and rearing environment, and interspecific
comparisons generally show higher growth rates at higher latitudes.
However, to elucidate the mechanisms behind this gradient in growth rate,
intraspecific comparisons are needed. Recently, barnacle geese expanded
their Arctic breeding range from the Russian Barents Sea coast southwards,
and now also breed along the Baltic and North Sea coasts. Baltic breeders
shortened their migration, while barnacle geese breeding along the North
Sea stopped migrating entirely. We collected cross-sectional data on
gosling tarsus length, head length and body mass, and constructed
population-specific growth curves to compare growth rates among three
populations (Barents Sea, Baltic Sea and North Sea) spanning 17° in
latitude. Growth rate was faster at higher latitudes, and the gradient
resembled the latitudinal gradient previously observed in an interspecific
comparison of precocial species. Differences in day length among the three
breeding regions could largely explain the observed differences in growth
rate. In the Baltic, and especially in the Arctic population, growth rate
was slower later in the season, most likely because of the stronger
seasonal decline in food quality. Our results suggest that differences in
postnatal growth rate between the Arctic and temperate populations are
mainly a plastic response to local environmental conditions. This
plasticity can increase the individuals’ ability to cope with annual
variation in local conditions, but can also increase the potential to
re-distribute and adapt to new breeding environments. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqhc |