Genetic differentiation and demographic trajectory of the insular Formosan and Orii’s flying foxes
Insular flying foxes are keystone species in island ecosystems due to their critical roles in plant pollination and seed dispersal. These species are vulnerable to population decline because of their small populations and low reproductive rates. The Formosan flying fox (Pteropus dasymallus formosus)...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Insular flying foxes are keystone species in island ecosystems due to
their critical roles in plant pollination and seed dispersal. These
species are vulnerable to population decline because of their small
populations and low reproductive rates. The Formosan flying fox (Pteropus
dasymallus formosus) is one of the five subspecies of the Ryukyu flying
fox. P. d. formosus has suffered from a severe decline and is currently
recognized as a critically endangered population in Taiwan. On the
contrary, the Orii’s flying fox (P. d. inopinatus) is a relatively stable
population inhabiting Okinawa Island. Here, we applied a genomic approach
called double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing to study
these two subspecies for a total of seven individuals. We detected
significant genetic structure between the two populations. Despite their
contrasting contemporary population sizes, both populations harbor very
low degrees of genetic diversity. We further inferred their demographic
history based on the joint folded site frequency spectrum and revealed
that both P. d. formosus and P. d. inopinatus had maintained small
population sizes for a long period of time after their divergence.
Recently, these populations experienced distinct trajectories of
demographic changes. While P. d. formosus suffered from a drastic ~10-fold
population decline not long ago, P. d. inopinatus underwent a ~4.5-fold
population expansion. Our results suggest separate conservation management
for the two populations—population recovery is urgently needed for P. d.
formosus while long-term monitoring for adverse genetic effects should be
considered for P. d. inopinatus. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.msbcc2fxh |