Data from: High-elevation range limit of an annual herb is neither caused nor reinforced by declining pollinator service
1. Pollination failure has been proposed to be an important determinant of plant species’ range limits, if pollinator activity declines along an environmental gradient, directly limiting plant populations, or if plant populations decline along an environmental gradient and subsequently fail to attra...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. Pollination failure has been proposed to be an important determinant of
plant species’ range limits, if pollinator activity declines along an
environmental gradient, directly limiting plant populations, or if plant
populations decline along an environmental gradient and subsequently fail
to attract sufficient visitation. Both mechanisms predict reduced
pollinator visitation, increased pollen limitation, and decreased seed
production towards range limits, and the first additionally predicts
declining pollinator abundance independent of any particular plant
species. However, many self-compatible species have some capacity for
autonomous self-fertilization, which may buffer reproductive success from
declining pollinator visitation if inbreeding depression is mild. Thus
pollinator-mediated limits may also predict selection for reduced reliance
on pollinators towards range limits. 2. We tested these predictions
towards the high-elevation limit of the self-compatible, bumble bee
(Bombus) pollinated Rhinanthus minor, along two elevation transects in the
Rocky Mountains of Alberta, Canada. 3. Bombus abundance was highest at
mid- (range-centre) and high-elevation (range limit) sites, so declining
pollinator abundance is unlikely to impose high-elevation limits for
bumble bee pollinated species in this area. 4. Flowers per plant and per
m2 declined at upper range limits, potentially rendering edge populations
less attractive. However, visitation rate did not decline towards the
range limit at either transect. Stigmatic pollen receipt declined with
increasing elevation, but seed set did not, nor did outcross pollen
supplementation increase seed set at any site. 5. Investment in floral
attractiveness (corolla area/ovary area) increased towards range limits,
but capacity for high-quality autonomous seed set and adult inbreeding
coefficients inferred from genetic markers were uniformly high, suggesting
frequent self-fertilization and weak inbreeding depression throughout the
range. 6. Synthesis We found no evidence for pollination failure towards
the upper range limit of R. minor. Moreover, unlike some species with a
capacity for autogamy, autonomous selfing makes a major contribution to R.
minor's mating system and demography, and likely buffers reproductive
success from stochasticity in pollination. Continued investment in floral
attractiveness despite high autonomous selfing suggests some evolutionary
benefit to pollinator-mediated outcrossing, rather than ecologi |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.m72m9 |