Assessment of targeted enrichment locus capture across time and museums using odonate specimens
The use of gDNA isolated from museum specimens for high throughput sequencing, especially targeted sequencing in the context of phylogenetics, is a common practice. Yet, little understanding has been focused on comparing the quality of DNA and the results of sequencing museum DNAs. Dragonflies and d...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of gDNA isolated from museum specimens for high throughput
sequencing, especially targeted sequencing in the context of
phylogenetics, is a common practice. Yet, little understanding has been
focused on comparing the quality of DNA and the results of sequencing
museum DNAs. Dragonflies and damselflies are ubiquitous in freshwater
ecosystems and are commonly collected and preserved insects in museum
collections hence their use in this study. However, the history of odonate
preservation across time and museums have resulted in wide variability in
the success of viable DNA extraction, necessitating an assessment of their
usefulness in genetic studies. Using Anchored Hybrid Enrichment probes, we
sequenced DNA from samples at two museums, 48 from the American Museum of
Natural History (AMNH) in NYC, USA, and 46 from the Naturalis Biodiversity
Center (RMNH) in Leiden, Netherlands ranging from global collection
localities and across a 120-year time span. We recovered at least 4 loci
out of an >1000 locus probe set for all samples, with the average
capture being ~385 loci. Neither specimen age nor size was a good
predictor of locus capture, but recapture rates differed significantly
between museums. Samples from the AMNH had lower overall locus capture
than the RMNH, perhaps due to differences in specimen storage over time. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.kprr4xh8z |