Data from: Does trait-based joint species distribution modelling reveal the signature of competition in stream macroinvertebrate communities?
1. The occupancy and abundance of species are jointly driven by local factors, such as environmental characteristics and biotic interactions, and regional-scale factors, such as dispersal and climate. Recently, it has been shown that biotic interactions shape species occupancies and abundances beyon...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. The occupancy and abundance of species are jointly driven by local
factors, such as environmental characteristics and biotic interactions,
and regional-scale factors, such as dispersal and climate. Recently, it
has been shown that biotic interactions shape species occupancies and
abundances beyond local extents. However, for small ectothermic animals,
particularly for those occurring in freshwater environments, the
importance of biotic interactions remains understudied. Species-to-species
associations from joint species distribution models (i.e. species
associations while controlling for environmental characteristics) are
increasingly used to draw hypotheses of which species possibly show biotic
interactions. 2. We studied whether species-to-species associations from
joint species distribution models show signs of competition using a
hypothesis testing framework in stream macroinvertebrate communities at
regional extent. 3. We sampled aquatic macroinvertebrates from 105 stream
sites in western Finland encompassing a latitudinal gradient of ca. 500
kilometers. We hypothesized that if competition drives these associations
(H1) functionally similar species are mostly negatively associated,
whereas functionally dissimilar species show random associations. We
further hypothesized that the relationship between functional
dissimilarity and the strength of association is more pronounced (H2) for
abundances rather than occupancies, (H3) at small grain (i.e. stream site)
rather than at large grain (i.e. river basin), and (H4) among species
having weak dispersal ability than among species with high dispersal
ability. 4. Stream macroinvertebrates showed both negative and positive
species-to-species associations while controlling for habitat
characteristics. However, the negative associations were mostly at large
grain (river basin) rather than at small grain (stream site), in occupancy
rather than abundance, and not related to species functional dissimilarity
or to their dispersal ability. Thus, all our hypotheses considering
possible competition (H1-H4) were rejected. 5. Competition does not appear
to be a major driving force of stream macroinvertebrate communities at the
spatial grain sizes considered. The observed positive associations in
occupancy at small grain (stream site) may be attributed to species’
similar microhabitat preferences, whereas at large grain (river basin),
they may stem from metacommunity dynamics. Our results highlight that
species traits w |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.k98sf7m5h |