Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?
Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based electricity are scalabl...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Floess, Emily Grieshop, Andrew Puzzolo, Elisa Pope, Daniel Leach, Nicholas Smith, Christopher J. Gill-Wiehl, Annelise Landesman, Katherine Bailis, Robert |
description | Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths
annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and
greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based
electricity are scalable alternatives to polluting fuels but have raised
climate and health concerns. Here, we compare emissions and climate
impacts of a business-as-usual household cooking fuel trajectory to four
large-scale transitions to gas and/or grid electricity in 77 LMICs. We
account for upstream and end-use emissions from gas and electric cooking,
assuming electrical grids evolve according to the 2022 World Energy
Outlook’s “Stated Policies” Scenario. We input the emissions into a
reduced-complexity climate model to estimate radiative forcing and
temperature changes associated with each scenario. We find full
transitions to LPG and/or electricity decrease emissions from both
well-mixed GHG and short-lived climate forcers, resulting in a roughly 5
millikelvin global temperature reduction by 2040. Transitions to LPG
and/or electricity also reduce annual emissions of PM2.5 by over 6 Mt
(99%) by 2040, which would substantially lower health risks from Household
Air Pollution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9 |
format | Dataset |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d9</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjzFvAjEMRrMwVMDc1X_g4K4VCFgYEKg77JFJfIchl0Biim7jpxMQ6t7Jw3ufpafUZ1WOJuW0GtvYoR0dL1_738vMzj_UfWvQsW_geoYGE6C3QI6MRDZgQjg9GXtw4Va8YMvWOirYm9BSNq4-q5QWsHLcohDIIRIKhJhV4QaFg4ckMbOmgxvLIa-KPXmqWdJyoHo1ukTD9-2r8Wa9W_0UFgUNC-lzzI9jp6tSPxv0q0H_NXz_f_EA8YlcJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Floess, Emily ; Grieshop, Andrew ; Puzzolo, Elisa ; Pope, Daniel ; Leach, Nicholas ; Smith, Christopher J. ; Gill-Wiehl, Annelise ; Landesman, Katherine ; Bailis, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Floess, Emily ; Grieshop, Andrew ; Puzzolo, Elisa ; Pope, Daniel ; Leach, Nicholas ; Smith, Christopher J. ; Gill-Wiehl, Annelise ; Landesman, Katherine ; Bailis, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths
annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and
greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based
electricity are scalable alternatives to polluting fuels but have raised
climate and health concerns. Here, we compare emissions and climate
impacts of a business-as-usual household cooking fuel trajectory to four
large-scale transitions to gas and/or grid electricity in 77 LMICs. We
account for upstream and end-use emissions from gas and electric cooking,
assuming electrical grids evolve according to the 2022 World Energy
Outlook’s “Stated Policies” Scenario. We input the emissions into a
reduced-complexity climate model to estimate radiative forcing and
temperature changes associated with each scenario. We find full
transitions to LPG and/or electricity decrease emissions from both
well-mixed GHG and short-lived climate forcers, resulting in a roughly 5
millikelvin global temperature reduction by 2040. Transitions to LPG
and/or electricity also reduce annual emissions of PM2.5 by over 6 Mt
(99%) by 2040, which would substantially lower health risks from Household
Air Pollution.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dryad</publisher><subject>clean cooking ; Climate change ; Climate modeling ; energy transitions ; FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences ; life cycle analysis (LCA)</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4111-3760</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Floess, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieshop, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzzolo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill-Wiehl, Annelise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landesman, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailis, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?</title><description>Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths
annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and
greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based
electricity are scalable alternatives to polluting fuels but have raised
climate and health concerns. Here, we compare emissions and climate
impacts of a business-as-usual household cooking fuel trajectory to four
large-scale transitions to gas and/or grid electricity in 77 LMICs. We
account for upstream and end-use emissions from gas and electric cooking,
assuming electrical grids evolve according to the 2022 World Energy
Outlook’s “Stated Policies” Scenario. We input the emissions into a
reduced-complexity climate model to estimate radiative forcing and
temperature changes associated with each scenario. We find full
transitions to LPG and/or electricity decrease emissions from both
well-mixed GHG and short-lived climate forcers, resulting in a roughly 5
millikelvin global temperature reduction by 2040. Transitions to LPG
and/or electricity also reduce annual emissions of PM2.5 by over 6 Mt
(99%) by 2040, which would substantially lower health risks from Household
Air Pollution.</description><subject>clean cooking</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate modeling</subject><subject>energy transitions</subject><subject>FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences</subject><subject>life cycle analysis (LCA)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjzFvAjEMRrMwVMDc1X_g4K4VCFgYEKg77JFJfIchl0Biim7jpxMQ6t7Jw3ufpafUZ1WOJuW0GtvYoR0dL1_738vMzj_UfWvQsW_geoYGE6C3QI6MRDZgQjg9GXtw4Va8YMvWOirYm9BSNq4-q5QWsHLcohDIIRIKhJhV4QaFg4ckMbOmgxvLIa-KPXmqWdJyoHo1ukTD9-2r8Wa9W_0UFgUNC-lzzI9jp6tSPxv0q0H_NXz_f_EA8YlcJg</recordid><startdate>20230112</startdate><enddate>20230112</enddate><creator>Floess, Emily</creator><creator>Grieshop, Andrew</creator><creator>Puzzolo, Elisa</creator><creator>Pope, Daniel</creator><creator>Leach, Nicholas</creator><creator>Smith, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Gill-Wiehl, Annelise</creator><creator>Landesman, Katherine</creator><creator>Bailis, Robert</creator><general>Dryad</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-3760</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230112</creationdate><title>Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?</title><author>Floess, Emily ; Grieshop, Andrew ; Puzzolo, Elisa ; Pope, Daniel ; Leach, Nicholas ; Smith, Christopher J. ; Gill-Wiehl, Annelise ; Landesman, Katherine ; Bailis, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>clean cooking</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate modeling</topic><topic>energy transitions</topic><topic>FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences</topic><topic>life cycle analysis (LCA)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Floess, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieshop, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puzzolo, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leach, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill-Wiehl, Annelise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landesman, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailis, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Floess, Emily</au><au>Grieshop, Andrew</au><au>Puzzolo, Elisa</au><au>Pope, Daniel</au><au>Leach, Nicholas</au><au>Smith, Christopher J.</au><au>Gill-Wiehl, Annelise</au><au>Landesman, Katherine</au><au>Bailis, Robert</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?</title><date>2023-01-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths
annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and
greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based
electricity are scalable alternatives to polluting fuels but have raised
climate and health concerns. Here, we compare emissions and climate
impacts of a business-as-usual household cooking fuel trajectory to four
large-scale transitions to gas and/or grid electricity in 77 LMICs. We
account for upstream and end-use emissions from gas and electric cooking,
assuming electrical grids evolve according to the 2022 World Energy
Outlook’s “Stated Policies” Scenario. We input the emissions into a
reduced-complexity climate model to estimate radiative forcing and
temperature changes associated with each scenario. We find full
transitions to LPG and/or electricity decrease emissions from both
well-mixed GHG and short-lived climate forcers, resulting in a roughly 5
millikelvin global temperature reduction by 2040. Transitions to LPG
and/or electricity also reduce annual emissions of PM2.5 by over 6 Mt
(99%) by 2040, which would substantially lower health risks from Household
Air Pollution.</abstract><pub>Dryad</pub><doi>10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-3760</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | DOI: 10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d9 |
source | DataCite |
subjects | clean cooking Climate change Climate modeling energy transitions FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences life cycle analysis (LCA) |
title | Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A23%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Floess,%20Emily&rft.date=2023-01-12&rft_id=info:doi/10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5061_dryad_jq2bvq8d9%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |