Scaling up gas and electric cooking in low- and middle-income countries: Climate threat or mitigation strategy with co-benefits?
Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based electricity are scalabl...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Nearly three billion people in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
rely on polluting fuels, resulting in millions of avoidable deaths
annually. Polluting fuels also emit short-lived climate forcers and
greenhouse gases (GHGs). Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and grid-based
electricity are scalable alternatives to polluting fuels but have raised
climate and health concerns. Here, we compare emissions and climate
impacts of a business-as-usual household cooking fuel trajectory to four
large-scale transitions to gas and/or grid electricity in 77 LMICs. We
account for upstream and end-use emissions from gas and electric cooking,
assuming electrical grids evolve according to the 2022 World Energy
Outlook’s “Stated Policies” Scenario. We input the emissions into a
reduced-complexity climate model to estimate radiative forcing and
temperature changes associated with each scenario. We find full
transitions to LPG and/or electricity decrease emissions from both
well-mixed GHG and short-lived climate forcers, resulting in a roughly 5
millikelvin global temperature reduction by 2040. Transitions to LPG
and/or electricity also reduce annual emissions of PM2.5 by over 6 Mt
(99%) by 2040, which would substantially lower health risks from Household
Air Pollution. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8d9 |