Data from: Dispersal ability and habitat requirements determine landscape-level genetic patterns in desert aquatic insects
Species occupying the same geographic range can exhibit remarkably different population structures across the landscape, ranging from highly diversified to panmictic. Given limitations on collecting population-level data for large numbers of species, ecologists seek to identify proximate organismal...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Species occupying the same geographic range can exhibit remarkably
different population structures across the landscape, ranging from highly
diversified to panmictic. Given limitations on collecting population-level
data for large numbers of species, ecologists seek to identify proximate
organismal traits—such as dispersal ability, habitat preference and life
history—that are strong predictors of realized population structure. We
examined how dispersal ability and habitat structure affect the regional
balance of gene flow and genetic drift within three aquatic insects that
represent the range of dispersal abilities and habitat requirements
observed in desert stream insect communities. For each species, we tested
for linear relationships between genetic distances and geographic
distances using Euclidean and landscape-based metrics of resistance. We
found that the moderate-disperser Mesocapnia arizonensis (Plecoptera:
Capniidae) has a strong isolation-by-distance pattern, suggesting
migration–drift equilibrium. By contrast, population structure in the
flightless Abedus herberti (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) is influenced by
genetic drift, while gene flow is the dominant force in the strong-flying
Boreonectes aequinoctialis (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). The best-fitting
landscape model for M. arizonensis was based on Euclidean distance.
Analyses also identified a strong spatial scale-dependence, where
landscape genetic methods only performed well for species that were
intermediate in dispersal ability. Our results highlight the fact that
when either gene flow or genetic drift dominates in shaping population
structure, no detectable relationship between genetic and geographic
distances is expected at certain spatial scales. This study provides
insight into how gene flow and drift interact at the regional scale for
these insects as well as the organisms that share similar habitats and
dispersal abilities. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.hb558 |