Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology

Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Scherer, Sascha, Deckers, Katleen, Dietel, Jan, Fuchs, Markus, Henkner, Jessica, Höpfer, Benjamin, Junge, Andrea, Kandeler, Ellen, Lehndorff, Eva, Leinweber, Peter, Lomax, Johanna, Miera, Jan, Poll, Christian, Toffolo, Michael, Knopf, Thomas, Scholten, Thomas, Kühn, Peter
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Scherer, Sascha
Deckers, Katleen
Dietel, Jan
Fuchs, Markus
Henkner, Jessica
Höpfer, Benjamin
Junge, Andrea
Kandeler, Ellen
Lehndorff, Eva
Leinweber, Peter
Lomax, Johanna
Miera, Jan
Poll, Christian
Toffolo, Michael
Knopf, Thomas
Scholten, Thomas
Kühn, Peter
description Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronostratigraphy and archaeology. For this reason, there is often a substantial gap in the qualitative identification of specific land use practices that caused prehistoric soil erosion. We use an archaeopedological multi-proxy approach on a multi-layered colluvial deposit (six colluvial horizons) at the prehistoric site of Fürstenberg (Southwest Germany) to gain detailed insights into the soil erosion history, past pedogenesis and land use practices since the Neolithic. Soil and geochemical analyses such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), pedogenic oxides, pH-value and calcium carbonate content support the chronostratigraphy based on ages from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and AMS 14C dating. Further, biogeochemical analyses of phytoliths, charcoal spectra, black carbon (BC), soil organic matter (SOM) composition by using pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectroscopy (Py-FIMS), urease activity, steroid biomarker and heavy metals (HM) are used as land use proxies. The OSL and 14C ages indicate five phases of colluvial deposition and land use comprising the Early to Younger Neolithic, the Urnfield to Hallstatt period, the Iron to Roman Age, the High Middle Ages and the pre-modern period. The soil and geochemical proxies correlate with a phase of geomorphodynamic stability between the Early to Younger Neolithic and the Urnfield to Hallstatt period. The high abundance of grass morphotypes since the Neolithic and the increase of Juniperus species since the Urnfield to Hallstatt period indicate a persistent anthropogenic impact on the vegetation. Considerable amounts of burned OM (up to 1600 g BC kg-1 SOC, also identified as thermally stabilized SOM compounds by Py-FIMS) at greater soil depths provide information that fire clearing (e.g. slash-and-burn) was especially used to open and maintain the landscape until the Roman Age. The absence of phytolith species originating from cereals, the occurrence of Juniperus and the evidence from the analysis of urease activity and faecal biomarkers indicate that the slopes of the Fürstenberg were mainly used for livestock farming and wood procurement. Thus, the application of specific soil-biogeochemical
doi_str_mv 10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNTAz1E8pqkxM0UszzzVITqsoruJkCHRJLElUSCvKz7VSCM9ILHnUMLNYITNPIVEhOT8np7QsMzFHISW1IL84s8RewS-1XKEgtai4IDW5JLMstRisTyGxKDkjMTW_IDUlPyc_vZKHgTUtMac4lRdKczPou7mGOHvopgBtSs4sSY0vKMrMTSyqjDc0iAc5Kh7sqHi4o4xJ1wEAeMRMig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>Scherer, Sascha ; Deckers, Katleen ; Dietel, Jan ; Fuchs, Markus ; Henkner, Jessica ; Höpfer, Benjamin ; Junge, Andrea ; Kandeler, Ellen ; Lehndorff, Eva ; Leinweber, Peter ; Lomax, Johanna ; Miera, Jan ; Poll, Christian ; Toffolo, Michael ; Knopf, Thomas ; Scholten, Thomas ; Kühn, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sascha ; Deckers, Katleen ; Dietel, Jan ; Fuchs, Markus ; Henkner, Jessica ; Höpfer, Benjamin ; Junge, Andrea ; Kandeler, Ellen ; Lehndorff, Eva ; Leinweber, Peter ; Lomax, Johanna ; Miera, Jan ; Poll, Christian ; Toffolo, Michael ; Knopf, Thomas ; Scholten, Thomas ; Kühn, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronostratigraphy and archaeology. For this reason, there is often a substantial gap in the qualitative identification of specific land use practices that caused prehistoric soil erosion. We use an archaeopedological multi-proxy approach on a multi-layered colluvial deposit (six colluvial horizons) at the prehistoric site of Fürstenberg (Southwest Germany) to gain detailed insights into the soil erosion history, past pedogenesis and land use practices since the Neolithic. Soil and geochemical analyses such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), pedogenic oxides, pH-value and calcium carbonate content support the chronostratigraphy based on ages from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and AMS 14C dating. Further, biogeochemical analyses of phytoliths, charcoal spectra, black carbon (BC), soil organic matter (SOM) composition by using pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectroscopy (Py-FIMS), urease activity, steroid biomarker and heavy metals (HM) are used as land use proxies. The OSL and 14C ages indicate five phases of colluvial deposition and land use comprising the Early to Younger Neolithic, the Urnfield to Hallstatt period, the Iron to Roman Age, the High Middle Ages and the pre-modern period. The soil and geochemical proxies correlate with a phase of geomorphodynamic stability between the Early to Younger Neolithic and the Urnfield to Hallstatt period. The high abundance of grass morphotypes since the Neolithic and the increase of Juniperus species since the Urnfield to Hallstatt period indicate a persistent anthropogenic impact on the vegetation. Considerable amounts of burned OM (up to 1600 g BC kg-1 SOC, also identified as thermally stabilized SOM compounds by Py-FIMS) at greater soil depths provide information that fire clearing (e.g. slash-and-burn) was especially used to open and maintain the landscape until the Roman Age. The absence of phytolith species originating from cereals, the occurrence of Juniperus and the evidence from the analysis of urease activity and faecal biomarkers indicate that the slopes of the Fürstenberg were mainly used for livestock farming and wood procurement. Thus, the application of specific soil-biogeochemical proxies to colluvial deposits provide new information on the nature of past land use practices that caused soil erosion and the formation of colluvial deposits at that time. In general, archaeopedological multi-proxy analyses of colluvial deposits, integrating the local archaeological record, contributes to a refined understanding of how humans have shaped the landscape since the Neolithic.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dryad</publisher><creationdate>2020</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2854-0012 ; 0000-0001-6004-5188 ; 0000-0003-4779-1199 ; 0000-0001-5894-4301 ; 0000-0001-8087-5306 ; 0000-0002-1614-8347 ; 0000-0002-4417-5633 ; 0000-0002-1389-9516</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>777,1888</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckers, Katleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höpfer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junge, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandeler, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehndorff, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinweber, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miera, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poll, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toffolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knopf, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology</title><description>Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronostratigraphy and archaeology. For this reason, there is often a substantial gap in the qualitative identification of specific land use practices that caused prehistoric soil erosion. We use an archaeopedological multi-proxy approach on a multi-layered colluvial deposit (six colluvial horizons) at the prehistoric site of Fürstenberg (Southwest Germany) to gain detailed insights into the soil erosion history, past pedogenesis and land use practices since the Neolithic. Soil and geochemical analyses such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), pedogenic oxides, pH-value and calcium carbonate content support the chronostratigraphy based on ages from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and AMS 14C dating. Further, biogeochemical analyses of phytoliths, charcoal spectra, black carbon (BC), soil organic matter (SOM) composition by using pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectroscopy (Py-FIMS), urease activity, steroid biomarker and heavy metals (HM) are used as land use proxies. The OSL and 14C ages indicate five phases of colluvial deposition and land use comprising the Early to Younger Neolithic, the Urnfield to Hallstatt period, the Iron to Roman Age, the High Middle Ages and the pre-modern period. The soil and geochemical proxies correlate with a phase of geomorphodynamic stability between the Early to Younger Neolithic and the Urnfield to Hallstatt period. The high abundance of grass morphotypes since the Neolithic and the increase of Juniperus species since the Urnfield to Hallstatt period indicate a persistent anthropogenic impact on the vegetation. Considerable amounts of burned OM (up to 1600 g BC kg-1 SOC, also identified as thermally stabilized SOM compounds by Py-FIMS) at greater soil depths provide information that fire clearing (e.g. slash-and-burn) was especially used to open and maintain the landscape until the Roman Age. The absence of phytolith species originating from cereals, the occurrence of Juniperus and the evidence from the analysis of urease activity and faecal biomarkers indicate that the slopes of the Fürstenberg were mainly used for livestock farming and wood procurement. Thus, the application of specific soil-biogeochemical proxies to colluvial deposits provide new information on the nature of past land use practices that caused soil erosion and the formation of colluvial deposits at that time. In general, archaeopedological multi-proxy analyses of colluvial deposits, integrating the local archaeological record, contributes to a refined understanding of how humans have shaped the landscape since the Neolithic.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYBA3NNAzNTAz1E8pqkxM0UszzzVITqsoruJkCHRJLElUSCvKz7VSCM9ILHnUMLNYITNPIVEhOT8np7QsMzFHISW1IL84s8RewS-1XKEgtai4IDW5JLMstRisTyGxKDkjMTW_IDUlPyc_vZKHgTUtMac4lRdKczPou7mGOHvopgBtSs4sSY0vKMrMTSyqjDc0iAc5Kh7sqHi4o4xJ1wEAeMRMig</recordid><startdate>20200821</startdate><enddate>20200821</enddate><creator>Scherer, Sascha</creator><creator>Deckers, Katleen</creator><creator>Dietel, Jan</creator><creator>Fuchs, Markus</creator><creator>Henkner, Jessica</creator><creator>Höpfer, Benjamin</creator><creator>Junge, Andrea</creator><creator>Kandeler, Ellen</creator><creator>Lehndorff, Eva</creator><creator>Leinweber, Peter</creator><creator>Lomax, Johanna</creator><creator>Miera, Jan</creator><creator>Poll, Christian</creator><creator>Toffolo, Michael</creator><creator>Knopf, Thomas</creator><creator>Scholten, Thomas</creator><creator>Kühn, Peter</creator><general>Dryad</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-0012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-5188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-1199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-4301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-5306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-8347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-5633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-9516</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200821</creationdate><title>Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology</title><author>Scherer, Sascha ; Deckers, Katleen ; Dietel, Jan ; Fuchs, Markus ; Henkner, Jessica ; Höpfer, Benjamin ; Junge, Andrea ; Kandeler, Ellen ; Lehndorff, Eva ; Leinweber, Peter ; Lomax, Johanna ; Miera, Jan ; Poll, Christian ; Toffolo, Michael ; Knopf, Thomas ; Scholten, Thomas ; Kühn, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Sascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckers, Katleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietel, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchs, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henkner, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höpfer, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junge, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandeler, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehndorff, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinweber, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomax, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miera, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poll, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toffolo, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knopf, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholten, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scherer, Sascha</au><au>Deckers, Katleen</au><au>Dietel, Jan</au><au>Fuchs, Markus</au><au>Henkner, Jessica</au><au>Höpfer, Benjamin</au><au>Junge, Andrea</au><au>Kandeler, Ellen</au><au>Lehndorff, Eva</au><au>Leinweber, Peter</au><au>Lomax, Johanna</au><au>Miera, Jan</au><au>Poll, Christian</au><au>Toffolo, Michael</au><au>Knopf, Thomas</au><au>Scholten, Thomas</au><au>Kühn, Peter</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology</title><date>2020-08-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronostratigraphy and archaeology. For this reason, there is often a substantial gap in the qualitative identification of specific land use practices that caused prehistoric soil erosion. We use an archaeopedological multi-proxy approach on a multi-layered colluvial deposit (six colluvial horizons) at the prehistoric site of Fürstenberg (Southwest Germany) to gain detailed insights into the soil erosion history, past pedogenesis and land use practices since the Neolithic. Soil and geochemical analyses such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), pedogenic oxides, pH-value and calcium carbonate content support the chronostratigraphy based on ages from optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and AMS 14C dating. Further, biogeochemical analyses of phytoliths, charcoal spectra, black carbon (BC), soil organic matter (SOM) composition by using pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectroscopy (Py-FIMS), urease activity, steroid biomarker and heavy metals (HM) are used as land use proxies. The OSL and 14C ages indicate five phases of colluvial deposition and land use comprising the Early to Younger Neolithic, the Urnfield to Hallstatt period, the Iron to Roman Age, the High Middle Ages and the pre-modern period. The soil and geochemical proxies correlate with a phase of geomorphodynamic stability between the Early to Younger Neolithic and the Urnfield to Hallstatt period. The high abundance of grass morphotypes since the Neolithic and the increase of Juniperus species since the Urnfield to Hallstatt period indicate a persistent anthropogenic impact on the vegetation. Considerable amounts of burned OM (up to 1600 g BC kg-1 SOC, also identified as thermally stabilized SOM compounds by Py-FIMS) at greater soil depths provide information that fire clearing (e.g. slash-and-burn) was especially used to open and maintain the landscape until the Roman Age. The absence of phytolith species originating from cereals, the occurrence of Juniperus and the evidence from the analysis of urease activity and faecal biomarkers indicate that the slopes of the Fürstenberg were mainly used for livestock farming and wood procurement. Thus, the application of specific soil-biogeochemical proxies to colluvial deposits provide new information on the nature of past land use practices that caused soil erosion and the formation of colluvial deposits at that time. In general, archaeopedological multi-proxy analyses of colluvial deposits, integrating the local archaeological record, contributes to a refined understanding of how humans have shaped the landscape since the Neolithic.</abstract><pub>Dryad</pub><doi>10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-0012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-5188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-1199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-4301</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-5306</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-8347</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4417-5633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-9516</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz
source DataCite
title Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T12%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=Scherer,%20Sascha&rft.date=2020-08-21&rft_id=info:doi/10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5061_dryad_f7m0cfxsz%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true