Data from: What’s in a colluvial deposit? New perspectives from archaeopedology
Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived from the local chronos...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Colluvial deposits are considered as sedimentary archives for the
reconstruction of soil erosion history, Holocene climate, past pedogenesis
and land use. However, the human contribution to the formation of
colluvial deposits is mainly based on quantitative assumptions derived
from the local chronostratigraphy and archaeology. For this reason, there
is often a substantial gap in the qualitative identification of specific
land use practices that caused prehistoric soil erosion. We use an
archaeopedological multi-proxy approach on a multi-layered colluvial
deposit (six colluvial horizons) at the prehistoric site of Fürstenberg
(Southwest Germany) to gain detailed insights into the soil erosion
history, past pedogenesis and land use practices since the Neolithic. Soil
and geochemical analyses such as X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray
diffraction (XRD), pedogenic oxides, pH-value and calcium carbonate
content support the chronostratigraphy based on ages from optically
stimulated luminescence (OSL) and AMS 14C dating. Further, biogeochemical
analyses of phytoliths, charcoal spectra, black carbon (BC), soil organic
matter (SOM) composition by using pyrolysis-field ionization mass
spectroscopy (Py-FIMS), urease activity, steroid biomarker and heavy
metals (HM) are used as land use proxies. The OSL and 14C ages indicate
five phases of colluvial deposition and land use comprising the Early to
Younger Neolithic, the Urnfield to Hallstatt period, the Iron to Roman
Age, the High Middle Ages and the pre-modern period. The soil and
geochemical proxies correlate with a phase of geomorphodynamic stability
between the Early to Younger Neolithic and the Urnfield to Hallstatt
period. The high abundance of grass morphotypes since the Neolithic and
the increase of Juniperus species since the Urnfield to Hallstatt period
indicate a persistent anthropogenic impact on the vegetation. Considerable
amounts of burned OM (up to 1600 g BC kg-1 SOC, also identified as
thermally stabilized SOM compounds by Py-FIMS) at greater soil depths
provide information that fire clearing (e.g. slash-and-burn) was
especially used to open and maintain the landscape until the Roman Age.
The absence of phytolith species originating from cereals, the occurrence
of Juniperus and the evidence from the analysis of urease activity and
faecal biomarkers indicate that the slopes of the Fürstenberg were mainly
used for livestock farming and wood procurement. Thus, the application of
specific soil-biogeochemical |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.f7m0cfxsz |