Variation in behavioural traits of two frugivorous mammals may lead to differential responses to human disturbance
Human activities can lead to a shift in wildlife species’ spatial distribution. Understanding the specific effects of human activities on ranging behaviour can improve conservation management of wildlife populations in human-dominated landscapes. This study evaluated the effects of forest use by hum...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Human activities can lead to a shift in wildlife species’ spatial
distribution. Understanding the specific effects of human activities on
ranging behaviour can improve conservation management of wildlife
populations in human-dominated landscapes. This study evaluated the
effects of forest use by humans on the spatial distribution of mammal
species with different behavioural adaptations, using sympatric western
lowland gorilla and central chimpanzee as focal species. We collected data
on great ape nest locations, ecological and physical variables (habitat
distribution, permanent rivers and topographic data), as well as
anthropogenic variables (distance to trails, villages and a permanent
research site). Here, we show that anthropogenic variables are important
predictors of the distribution of wild animals. In the resource model, the
distribution of gorilla nests was predicted by nesting habitat
distribution, while chimpanzee nests were predicted first by elevation
followed by nesting habitat distribution. In the anthropogenic model, the
major predictors of gorilla nesting changed into human features, while the
major predictors of chimpanzee nesting remained elevation and the
availability of their preferred nesting habitats. Animal behavioural
traits (body size, terrestrial/arboreal, level of
specialization/generalization, and competitive inferiority/superiority)
may influence the response of mammals to human activities. Our results
suggest that chimpanzees may survive in human-encroached areas whenever
the availability of their nesting habitat and preferred fruits can support
their population, while a certain level of human activities may threaten
gorillas. Consequently, the survival of gorillas in human-dominated
landscapes is more at risk than that of chimpanzees. Replicating our
research in other sites should permit a systematic evaluation of the
influence of human activity on the distribution of mammal populations. As
wild animals are increasingly exposed to human disturbance, understanding
the resulting consequences of shifting species distributions due to human
disturbance on animal population abundance and their long-term survival
will be of growing conservation importance. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.f4qrfj6sk |