Data from: Early consequences of allopolyploidy alter floral evolution in Nicotiana (Solanaceae)
Background: Polyploidy has played a major role in angiosperm evolution. Previous studies have examined polyploid phenotypes in comparison to their extant progenitors, but not in context of predicted progenitor phenotypes at allopolyploid origin. In addition, differences in the trends of polyploid ve...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Polyploidy has played a major role in angiosperm evolution.
Previous studies have examined polyploid phenotypes in comparison to their
extant progenitors, but not in context of predicted progenitor phenotypes
at allopolyploid origin. In addition, differences in the trends of
polyploid versus diploid evolution have not been investigated. We use
ancestral character-state reconstructions to estimate progenitor phenotype
at allopolyploid origin to determine patterns of polyploid evolution
leading to morphology of the extant species. We also compare trends in
diploid versus allopolyploid evolution to determine if polyploidy modifies
floral evolutionary patterns. Results: Predicting the ancestral phenotype
of a nascent allopolyploid from reconstructions of diploid phenotypes at
the time of polyploid formation generates different phenotype predictions
than when extant diploid phenotypes are used, the outcome of which can
alter conclusions about polyploid evolution; however, most analyses yield
the same results. Using ancestral reconstructions of diploid floral
phenotypes indicate that young polyploids evolve shorter, wider corolla
tubes, but older polyploids and diploids do not show any detectable
evolutionary trends. Lability of the traits examined (floral shape,
corolla tube length, and corolla tube width) differs across young and
older polyploids and diploids. Corolla length is more evolutionarily
labile in older polyploids and diploids. Polyploids do not display unique
suites of floral characters based on both morphological and color traits,
but some suites of characters may be evolving together and seem to have
arisen multiple times within Nicotiana, perhaps due to the influence of
pollinators. Conclusions: Young polyploids display different trends in
floral evolution (shorter, wider corolla tubes, which may result in more
generalist pollination) than older polyploids and diploids, suggesting
that patterns of divergence are impacted by the early consequences of
allopolyploidy, perhaps arising from genomic shock and/or subsequent
genome stabilization associated with diploidization. Convergent evolution
in floral morphology and color in Nicotiana can be consistent with
pollinator preferences, suggesting that pollinators may have shaped floral
evolution in Nicotiana. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.f374gf0 |