Data from: Dorsoventral comparison of intraspecific variations in the butterfly wing pattern using a convolutional neural network
Butterfly wing patterns exhibit notable differences between the dorsal and ventral surfaces, and morphological analyses of them have provided insights into the ecological and behavioural characteristics of wing colour patterns. Conventional methods for dorsoventral comparisons are constrained by the...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Butterfly wing patterns exhibit notable differences between the dorsal and
ventral surfaces, and morphological analyses of them have provided
insights into the ecological and behavioural characteristics of wing
colour patterns. Conventional methods for dorsoventral comparisons are
constrained by the need for homologous patches or shared features between
two surfaces, limiting their applicability across species. We used a
convolutional neural network (CNN)-based analysis, which can compare
images of the two surfaces without focusing on homologous patches or
features, to detect dorsoventral bias in intraspecific variations: sexual
dimorphism and female-limited mimetic polymorphism (FMP). Using specimen
images of 29 species, we first showed that the level of sexual dimorphism
calculated by CNN-based analysis corresponded well with traditional
assessments of sexual dissimilarity, demonstrating the validity of the
method. Dorsal biases were widely detected in sexual dimorphism,
suggesting that the conventional hypothesis of dorsally biased sexual
selection can be supported in a broader range of species. In contrast, the
FMP showed no significant bias, indicating the importance of both surfaces
in mimicry. Our study demonstrates the potential versatility of CNN in
comparing wing patterns between the two surfaces, while providing broader
insights into the relationship between dorsoventrally different selections
and dorsoventral biases in intraspecific variations. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.djh9w0w8b |