Data from: Integrative taxonomy refutes a species hypothesis: the asymmetric hybrid origin of Arsapnia arapahoe (Plecoptera, Capniidae)
Molecular tools are commonly directed at refining taxonomies and the species that constitute their fundamental units. This has been especially insightful for groups for which species hypotheses are ambiguous and have largely been based on morphological differences between certain life stages or sexe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Molecular tools are commonly directed at refining taxonomies and the
species that constitute their fundamental units. This has been especially
insightful for groups for which species hypotheses are ambiguous and have
largely been based on morphological differences between certain life
stages or sexes, and has added importance when taxa are a focus of
conservation efforts. Here we examine the taxonomic status of Arsapnia
arapahoe, a winter stonefly in the family Capniidae that is a species of
conservation concern because of its limited abundance and restricted range
in northern Colorado, USA. Phylogenetic analyses of sequences of
mitochondrial and nuclear genes of this and other capniid stoneflies from
this region and elsewhere in western North America indicated extensive
haplotype sharing, limited genetic differences, and a lack of reciprocal
monophyly between A. arapahoe and the sympatric A. decepta, despite
distinctive and consistent morphological differences in the sexual
apparatus of males of both species. Analyses of autosomal and sex-linked
single nucleotide polymorphisms detected using genotyping by sequencing,
however, indicated that all individuals of A. arapahoe consisted of F1
hybrids between female A. decepta and males of another sympatric stonefly,
Capnia gracilaria. Rather than constitute a self-sustaining evolutionary
lineage, A. arapahoe appears to represent the product of nonintrogressive
hybridization in the limited area of syntopy between two widely
distributed taxa. This offers a cautionary tale for taxonomists and
conservation biologists working on the less-studied components of the
global fauna. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.c317v31 |