Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions

Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: McCabe, Jennifer, Clare, John, Miller, Tricia, Katzner, Todd, Cooper, Jeff, Somershoe, Scott, Hanni, David, Kelly, Christine, Sargent, Robert, Soehren, Eric, Threadgill, Carrie, Maddox, Mercedes, Stober, Jonathan, Martell, Mark, Salo, Thomas, Berry, Andrew, Lanzone, Michael, Braham, Melissa, McClure, Christopher
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator McCabe, Jennifer
Clare, John
Miller, Tricia
Katzner, Todd
Cooper, Jeff
Somershoe, Scott
Hanni, David
Kelly, Christine
Sargent, Robert
Soehren, Eric
Threadgill, Carrie
Maddox, Mercedes
Stober, Jonathan
Martell, Mark
Salo, Thomas
Berry, Andrew
Lanzone, Michael
Braham, Melissa
McClure, Christopher
description Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analyzed using resource selection functions (RSF), or spatially extensive locational data without individual resolution typically analyzed using species distribution models. Both analytical methodologies have certain desirable features, but analyses that combine individual- and population-level inference with flexible non-linear functions may provide improved predictions while accounting for individual variation. Here, we describe how RSFs can be fit using hierarchical generalized additive models (HGAMs) using widely available software, providing a means to explore individual variation in habitat associations and to generate species distribution maps. We used GPS tracking data from Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from across eastern North America with four environmental predictors to generate monthly distribution models. We considered three model structures that assumed different amounts of individual variation in the functional relationship between predictors and habitat use and used k-fold cross-validation to compare model performance. Models accounting for individual variability in shape and smoothness of functional responses performed best. Eagles exhibited the least amount of individual variation in response to land cover variables during winter months, with most individuals more closely adhering to the population-level trend. During summer months, eagles exhibited more substantial individual variation in shape and smoothness of the functional relationships, suggesting some need to account for individual variation in eagle habitat use for both inferential and predictive purposes, during this time of year. Because they allow users to blend flexible functions with random effects structures and are well-supported by a variety of software platforms, we believe that HGAMs provide a useful addition to the suite of analyses used for modeling habitat associations or predicting species distributions.
doi_str_mv 10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3
format Dataset
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>datacite_PQ8</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh3</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTzFOA0EM3IYCATWtP0BypwgUagSiRvQrZ-3kLG12T_beRcljeCvmhOhpPGOPPPaEcN93q8fuqV-TnpFWz-M2XbanYXMdvj7Y6qSJwThzalIL7KeyEIMdGhP4aBBW1DRIwgwHLt5lubiGRNJkZjhW4mwwap2FGAqfQIrJYWjmpFUvJC5NboBFjg4zquByEQuBjZyEDUisqeym5YPbcLXHbHz3izdh_fb6-fL-QNgwSeM4qnvpOfZd_EkYl4TxL-Hm_xvf7O9pXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dataset</recordtype></control><display><type>dataset</type><title>Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions</title><source>DataCite</source><creator>McCabe, Jennifer ; Clare, John ; Miller, Tricia ; Katzner, Todd ; Cooper, Jeff ; Somershoe, Scott ; Hanni, David ; Kelly, Christine ; Sargent, Robert ; Soehren, Eric ; Threadgill, Carrie ; Maddox, Mercedes ; Stober, Jonathan ; Martell, Mark ; Salo, Thomas ; Berry, Andrew ; Lanzone, Michael ; Braham, Melissa ; McClure, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Jennifer ; Clare, John ; Miller, Tricia ; Katzner, Todd ; Cooper, Jeff ; Somershoe, Scott ; Hanni, David ; Kelly, Christine ; Sargent, Robert ; Soehren, Eric ; Threadgill, Carrie ; Maddox, Mercedes ; Stober, Jonathan ; Martell, Mark ; Salo, Thomas ; Berry, Andrew ; Lanzone, Michael ; Braham, Melissa ; McClure, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analyzed using resource selection functions (RSF), or spatially extensive locational data without individual resolution typically analyzed using species distribution models. Both analytical methodologies have certain desirable features, but analyses that combine individual- and population-level inference with flexible non-linear functions may provide improved predictions while accounting for individual variation. Here, we describe how RSFs can be fit using hierarchical generalized additive models (HGAMs) using widely available software, providing a means to explore individual variation in habitat associations and to generate species distribution maps. We used GPS tracking data from Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from across eastern North America with four environmental predictors to generate monthly distribution models. We considered three model structures that assumed different amounts of individual variation in the functional relationship between predictors and habitat use and used k-fold cross-validation to compare model performance. Models accounting for individual variability in shape and smoothness of functional responses performed best. Eagles exhibited the least amount of individual variation in response to land cover variables during winter months, with most individuals more closely adhering to the population-level trend. During summer months, eagles exhibited more substantial individual variation in shape and smoothness of the functional relationships, suggesting some need to account for individual variation in eagle habitat use for both inferential and predictive purposes, during this time of year. Because they allow users to blend flexible functions with random effects structures and are well-supported by a variety of software platforms, we believe that HGAMs provide a useful addition to the suite of analyses used for modeling habitat associations or predicting species distributions.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dryad</publisher><subject>Aquila chrysaetos ; generalized additive models ; hierarchical models ; prediction ; resource selection functions ; species distribution modeling</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,1894</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://commons.datacite.org/doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3$$EView_record_in_DataCite.org$$FView_record_in_$$GDataCite.org$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzner, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somershoe, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanni, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargent, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soehren, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Threadgill, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddox, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martell, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salo, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzone, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braham, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions</title><description>Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analyzed using resource selection functions (RSF), or spatially extensive locational data without individual resolution typically analyzed using species distribution models. Both analytical methodologies have certain desirable features, but analyses that combine individual- and population-level inference with flexible non-linear functions may provide improved predictions while accounting for individual variation. Here, we describe how RSFs can be fit using hierarchical generalized additive models (HGAMs) using widely available software, providing a means to explore individual variation in habitat associations and to generate species distribution maps. We used GPS tracking data from Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from across eastern North America with four environmental predictors to generate monthly distribution models. We considered three model structures that assumed different amounts of individual variation in the functional relationship between predictors and habitat use and used k-fold cross-validation to compare model performance. Models accounting for individual variability in shape and smoothness of functional responses performed best. Eagles exhibited the least amount of individual variation in response to land cover variables during winter months, with most individuals more closely adhering to the population-level trend. During summer months, eagles exhibited more substantial individual variation in shape and smoothness of the functional relationships, suggesting some need to account for individual variation in eagle habitat use for both inferential and predictive purposes, during this time of year. Because they allow users to blend flexible functions with random effects structures and are well-supported by a variety of software platforms, we believe that HGAMs provide a useful addition to the suite of analyses used for modeling habitat associations or predicting species distributions.</description><subject>Aquila chrysaetos</subject><subject>generalized additive models</subject><subject>hierarchical models</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>resource selection functions</subject><subject>species distribution modeling</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dataset</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>dataset</recordtype><sourceid>PQ8</sourceid><recordid>eNqVTzFOA0EM3IYCATWtP0BypwgUagSiRvQrZ-3kLG12T_beRcljeCvmhOhpPGOPPPaEcN93q8fuqV-TnpFWz-M2XbanYXMdvj7Y6qSJwThzalIL7KeyEIMdGhP4aBBW1DRIwgwHLt5lubiGRNJkZjhW4mwwap2FGAqfQIrJYWjmpFUvJC5NboBFjg4zquByEQuBjZyEDUisqeym5YPbcLXHbHz3izdh_fb6-fL-QNgwSeM4qnvpOfZd_EkYl4TxL-Hm_xvf7O9pXA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>McCabe, Jennifer</creator><creator>Clare, John</creator><creator>Miller, Tricia</creator><creator>Katzner, Todd</creator><creator>Cooper, Jeff</creator><creator>Somershoe, Scott</creator><creator>Hanni, David</creator><creator>Kelly, Christine</creator><creator>Sargent, Robert</creator><creator>Soehren, Eric</creator><creator>Threadgill, Carrie</creator><creator>Maddox, Mercedes</creator><creator>Stober, Jonathan</creator><creator>Martell, Mark</creator><creator>Salo, Thomas</creator><creator>Berry, Andrew</creator><creator>Lanzone, Michael</creator><creator>Braham, Melissa</creator><creator>McClure, Christopher</creator><general>Dryad</general><scope>DYCCY</scope><scope>PQ8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions</title><author>McCabe, Jennifer ; Clare, John ; Miller, Tricia ; Katzner, Todd ; Cooper, Jeff ; Somershoe, Scott ; Hanni, David ; Kelly, Christine ; Sargent, Robert ; Soehren, Eric ; Threadgill, Carrie ; Maddox, Mercedes ; Stober, Jonathan ; Martell, Mark ; Salo, Thomas ; Berry, Andrew ; Lanzone, Michael ; Braham, Melissa ; McClure, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>datasets</rsrctype><prefilter>datasets</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aquila chrysaetos</topic><topic>generalized additive models</topic><topic>hierarchical models</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>resource selection functions</topic><topic>species distribution modeling</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCabe, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clare, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Tricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzner, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somershoe, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanni, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargent, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soehren, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Threadgill, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddox, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stober, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martell, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salo, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzone, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braham, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>DataCite (Open Access)</collection><collection>DataCite</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCabe, Jennifer</au><au>Clare, John</au><au>Miller, Tricia</au><au>Katzner, Todd</au><au>Cooper, Jeff</au><au>Somershoe, Scott</au><au>Hanni, David</au><au>Kelly, Christine</au><au>Sargent, Robert</au><au>Soehren, Eric</au><au>Threadgill, Carrie</au><au>Maddox, Mercedes</au><au>Stober, Jonathan</au><au>Martell, Mark</au><au>Salo, Thomas</au><au>Berry, Andrew</au><au>Lanzone, Michael</au><au>Braham, Melissa</au><au>McClure, Christopher</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>DATA</ristype><title>Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions</title><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analyzed using resource selection functions (RSF), or spatially extensive locational data without individual resolution typically analyzed using species distribution models. Both analytical methodologies have certain desirable features, but analyses that combine individual- and population-level inference with flexible non-linear functions may provide improved predictions while accounting for individual variation. Here, we describe how RSFs can be fit using hierarchical generalized additive models (HGAMs) using widely available software, providing a means to explore individual variation in habitat associations and to generate species distribution maps. We used GPS tracking data from Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from across eastern North America with four environmental predictors to generate monthly distribution models. We considered three model structures that assumed different amounts of individual variation in the functional relationship between predictors and habitat use and used k-fold cross-validation to compare model performance. Models accounting for individual variability in shape and smoothness of functional responses performed best. Eagles exhibited the least amount of individual variation in response to land cover variables during winter months, with most individuals more closely adhering to the population-level trend. During summer months, eagles exhibited more substantial individual variation in shape and smoothness of the functional relationships, suggesting some need to account for individual variation in eagle habitat use for both inferential and predictive purposes, during this time of year. Because they allow users to blend flexible functions with random effects structures and are well-supported by a variety of software platforms, we believe that HGAMs provide a useful addition to the suite of analyses used for modeling habitat associations or predicting species distributions.</abstract><pub>Dryad</pub><doi>10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_datacite_primary_10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh3
source DataCite
subjects Aquila chrysaetos
generalized additive models
hierarchical models
prediction
resource selection functions
species distribution modeling
title Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A09%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-datacite_PQ8&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.au=McCabe,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft_id=info:doi/10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3&rft_dat=%3Cdatacite_PQ8%3E10_5061_dryad_9p8cz8wh3%3C/datacite_PQ8%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true