Resource selection functions based on hierarchical generalized additive models provide new insights into individual animal variation and species distributions
Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial extents and analy...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Habitat selection studies are designed to generate predictions of species
distributions or inference regarding general habitat associations and
individual variation in habitat use. Such studies frequently involve
either individually indexed locations gathered across limited spatial
extents and analyzed using resource selection functions (RSF), or
spatially extensive locational data without individual resolution
typically analyzed using species distribution models. Both analytical
methodologies have certain desirable features, but analyses that combine
individual- and population-level inference with flexible non-linear
functions may provide improved predictions while accounting for individual
variation. Here, we describe how RSFs can be fit using hierarchical
generalized additive models (HGAMs) using widely available software,
providing a means to explore individual variation in habitat associations
and to generate species distribution maps. We used GPS tracking data from
Golden Eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) from across eastern North America with
four environmental predictors to generate monthly distribution models. We
considered three model structures that assumed different amounts of
individual variation in the functional relationship between predictors and
habitat use and used k-fold cross-validation to compare model performance.
Models accounting for individual variability in shape and smoothness of
functional responses performed best. Eagles exhibited the least amount of
individual variation in response to land cover variables during winter
months, with most individuals more closely adhering to the
population-level trend. During summer months, eagles exhibited more
substantial individual variation in shape and smoothness of the functional
relationships, suggesting some need to account for individual variation in
eagle habitat use for both inferential and predictive purposes, during
this time of year. Because they allow users to blend flexible functions
with random effects structures and are well-supported by a variety of
software platforms, we believe that HGAMs provide a useful addition to the
suite of analyses used for modeling habitat associations or predicting
species distributions. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wh3 |