Data from: Putting vascular epiphytes on the traits map
Epiphyte trait data for the paper Hietz et al. 2021 Putting vascular epiphytes on the traits map. Journal of Ecology Plant functional traits impact the fitness and environmental niche of plants. Major plant functional types have been characterized by their trait spectrum, and the environmental and p...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Epiphyte trait data for the paper Hietz et al. 2021 Putting vascular
epiphytes on the traits map. Journal of Ecology Plant functional traits
impact the fitness and environmental niche of plants. Major plant
functional types have been characterized by their trait spectrum, and the
environmental and phylogenetic imprints on traits have advanced several
ecological fields. Yet very few trait data on epiphytes, which represent
almost 10% of vascular plants, are available. We collated >80,000
mostly unpublished trait observations for 2,882 species of vascular
epiphytes that were compared with non-epiphytic herbs and trees (mainly
using data from www.try-db.org, which are not included in the Dryad
dataset) to test hypotheses related to how the epiphytic habit affects
traits, and if epiphytes occupy a distinct region in the global trait
space. We also compared variation in traits among major groups of
epiphytes, and investigated the coordination of traits in epiphytes,
ground-rooted herbs and trees. Data include information on trait type,
unit of measurement, species, individuals, location and data contributor.
Epiphytes differ from ground-rooted plants mainly in traits related to
water relations. Unexpectedly, we did not find lower leaf nutrient
concentrations, except for nitrogen. Mean photosynthetic rates are much
lower than in ground-rooted plants and lower than expected from the
nitrogen concentrations. Trait syndromes clearly distinguish epiphytes
from trees and from most non-epiphytic herbs. Among the three largest
epiphytic taxa, orchids differ from bromeliads and ferns mainly by having
smaller and more numerous stomata, while ferns differ from bromeliads by
having thinner leaves, higher nutrient concentrations, and lower water
content and water use efficiency. Trait networks differ among epiphytes,
herbs and trees. While all have central nodes represented by specific leaf
area and mass-based photosynthesis, in epiphytes, traits related to plant
water relations have stronger connections, and nutrients other than
potassium have weaker connections to the remainder of the trait network.
Whereas stem specific density reflects mechanical support related to plant
size in herbs and trees, in epiphytes it mostly reflects water storage and
scales with leaf water content. Our findings advance our understanding of
epiphyte ecology, but we note that currently mainly leaf traits are
available. Important gaps are root, shoot and whole plant, demographic and
gas exchange |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.7wm37pvtf |