Data from: Response of pumas (Puma concolor) to migration of their primary prey in Patagonia
Large-scale ungulate migrations result in changes in prey availability for top predators and, as a consequence, can alter predator behavior. Migration may include entire populations of prey species, but often prey populations exhibit partial migration with some individuals remaining resident and oth...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Large-scale ungulate migrations result in changes in prey availability for
top predators and, as a consequence, can alter predator behavior.
Migration may include entire populations of prey species, but often prey
populations exhibit partial migration with some individuals remaining
resident and others migrating. Interactions of migratory prey and
predators have been documented in North America and some other parts of
the world, but are poorly studied in South America. We examined the
response of pumas (Puma concolor) to seasonal migration of guanacos (Lama
guanicoe) in La Payunia Reserve in northern Patagonia Argentina, which is
the site of the longest known ungulate migration in South America. More
than 15,000 guanacos migrate seasonally in this landscape, and some
guanacos also are resident year-round. We hypothesized that pumas would
respond to the guanaco migration by consuming more alternative prey rather
than migrating with guanacos because of the territoriality of pumas and
availability of alternative prey throughout the year at this site. To
determine whether pumas moved seasonally with the guanacos, we conducted
camera trapping in the summer and winter range of guanacos across both
seasons and estimated density of pumas with spatial mark–resight (SMR)
models. Also, we analyzed puma scats to assess changes in prey consumption
in response to guanaco migration. Density estimates of pumas did not
change significantly in the winter and summer range of guanacos when
guanacos migrated to and from these areas, indicating that pumas do not
follow the migration of guanacos. Pumas also did not consume more
alternative native prey or livestock when guanaco availability was lower,
but rather fed primarily on guanacos and some alternative prey during all
seasons. Alternative prey were most common in the diet during summer when
guanacos also were abundant on the summer range. The response of pumas to
the migration of guanacos differs from sites in the western North America
where entire prey populations migrate and pumas migrate with their prey or
switch to more abundant prey when their primary prey migrates. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.7fb7r |