Data from: Cohort feasibility study of an intermittent pneumatic compression device within a below-knee cast for the prevention of venous thromboembolism
Objectives: To determine the likely enrolment rate of eligible participants into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which a within-cast intermittent pneumatic compression device using Jet Impulse Technology (IPC/JIT) is 1 of 3 possible interventions in a RCT for the prevention of venous thromboe...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives: To determine the likely enrolment rate of eligible
participants into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which a
within-cast intermittent pneumatic compression device using Jet Impulse
Technology (IPC/JIT) is 1 of 3 possible interventions in a RCT for the
prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the clinical setting of
isolated lower limb cast immobilisation. Design: A prospective, open-label
feasibility study of the IPC/JIT device placed within a lower limb cast.
Setting: Wellington Regional Hospital Fracture Clinic. Participants:
Individuals aged 18–70 who presented with a lower limb injury requiring a
minimum of 4 weeks below-knee cast immobilisation. Intervention: Placement
of an IPC/JIT device within lower limb cast. Outcome measures: The main
outcome measure was the proportion of eligible participants who
participated in the feasibility study. Secondary outcome measures included
adherence to device usage throughout the study, ease of application of the
device and adverse events potentially associated with its use. Results:
The proportion of potentially eligible participants for the IPC/JIT device
was only 7/142 (5%), 95% CI 2 to 9.9. Devices were used for a mean (range)
of 4.1 (1.9 to 10.2) hours per day and none of 7 participants had adequate
adherence to the device. 3 of the 7 participants suffered an adverse
event, including 1 deep vein thrombosis, 2 dorsal foot ulcer and 1 skin
maceration. Conclusions: A within-cast IPC/JIT device is unlikely to be a
feasible randomisation arm for a RCT assessing possible interventions for
the reduction of VTE risk in the clinical setting of lower limb injury
requiring below knee cast immobilisation for a minimum of 4 weeks. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.5ms8t |