Landscape heterogeneity provides co-benefits to predator and prey
Predator populations are imperiled globally, due in part to changing habitat and trophic interactions. Theoretical and laboratory studies suggest that heterogeneous landscapes containing prey refuges acting as source habitats can benefit both predator and prey populations, although the importance of...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Predator populations are imperiled globally, due in part to changing
habitat and trophic interactions. Theoretical and laboratory studies
suggest that heterogeneous landscapes containing prey refuges acting as
source habitats can benefit both predator and prey populations, although
the importance of heterogeneity in natural systems is uncertain. Here, we
tested the hypothesis that landscape heterogeneity mediates predator-prey
interactions between the California spotted owl (Strix occidentalis
occidentalis) – a mature forest species – and one of its principal prey,
the dusky-footed woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes) – a younger forest species –
to the benefit of both. We did so by combining estimates of woodrat
density and survival from live-trapping and VHF tracking with direct
observations of prey deliveries to dependent young by owls in both
heterogeneous and homogeneous home ranges. Woodrat abundance was
approximately 2.5x higher in owl home ranges (1,412 hectares) featuring
greater heterogeneity in vegetation types (1,805.0 ± 50.2 SE) compared to
those dominated by mature forest (727.3 ± 51.9 SE), in large part because
of high densities in young forests appearing to act as sources promoting
woodrat densities in nearby mature forests. Woodrat mortality rates were
low across vegetation types and did not differ between heterogeneous and
homogeneous home ranges, yet all observed predation by owls occurred
within mature forests, suggesting young forests may act as woodrat
refuges. Owls exhibited a type 1 functional response, consuming
approximately 2.5x more woodrats in heterogeneous (31.1/month ± 5.2 SE)
versus homogeneous (12.7/month ± 3.7 SE) home ranges. While consumption of
smaller-bodied alternative prey partially compensated for lower woodrat
consumption in homogeneous home ranges, owls nevertheless consumed 30%
more biomass in heterogeneous home ranges – approximately equivalent to
the energetic needs of producing one additional offspring. Thus, a mosaic
of vegetation types including young forest patches increased woodrat
abundance and availability that, in turn, provided energetic and
potentially reproductive benefits to mature forest-associated spotted
owls. More broadly, our findings provide strong empirical evidence that
heterogeneous landscapes containing prey refuges can benefit both predator
and prey populations. As anthropogenic activities continue to homogenize
landscapes globally, promoting heterogeneous systems with prey refuges may
benefit impe |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.4mw6m90g5 |