Data from: The “tolerant chimpanzee” - towards the costs and benefits of sociality in female bonobos
Humans share an extraordinary degree of sociality with other primates, calling for comparative work into the evolutionary drivers of the variation in social engagement observed between species. Of particular interest is the contrast between the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and bonobo (Pan paniscus),...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Humans share an extraordinary degree of sociality with other primates,
calling for comparative work into the evolutionary drivers of the
variation in social engagement observed between species. Of particular
interest is the contrast between the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and
bonobo (Pan paniscus), the latter exhibiting increased female
gregariousness, more tolerant relationships, and elaborate behavioral
adaptations for conflict resolution. Here we test predictions from three
socio-ecological hypotheses regarding the evolution of these traits using
data on wild bonobos at LuiKotale, Democratic Republic of Congo. Focusing
on the behavior of co-feeding females and controlling for variation in
characteristics of the feeding patch, food intake rate moderately
increased while feeding effort decreased with female dominance rank,
indicating that females engaged in competitive exclusion from high quality
food resources. However, these rank effects did not translate into
variation in energy balance, as measured from urinary C-peptide levels.
Instead, energy balance varied independent of female rank with the
proportion of fruit in the diet. Together with the observation that
females join forces in conflicts with males, our results support the
hypothesis that predicts that females trade off feeding opportunities for
safety against male aggression. The key to a full understanding of
variation in social structure may be an integrated view of cooperation and
competition over access to the key resources food and mates, both within
and between the sexes. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.4c1246q |