Data from: Contemporary ancestor? Adaptive divergence from standing genetic variation in Pacific marine threespine stickleback
Background: Populations that have repeatedly colonized novel environments are useful for studying the role of ecology in adaptive divergence - particularly if some individuals persist in the ancestral habitat. Such "contemporary ancestors" can be used to demonstrate the effects of selectio...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Populations that have repeatedly colonized novel environments
are useful for studying the role of ecology in adaptive divergence -
particularly if some individuals persist in the ancestral habitat. Such
"contemporary ancestors" can be used to demonstrate the effects
of selection by comparing phenotypic and genetic divergence between the
derived population and their extant ancestors. However, evolution and
demography in these "contemporary ancestors" can complicate
inferences about the source (standing genetic variation, de novo mutation)
and pace of adaptive divergence. Marine threespine stickleback
(Gasterosteus aculeatus) have colonized freshwater environments along the
Pacific coast of North America, but have also persisted in the marine
environment. To what extent are marine stickleback good proxies of the
ancestral condition? Results: We sequenced >5800 variant loci in
over 250 marine stickleback from eight locations extending from Alaska to
California, and phenotyped them for platedness and body shape. Pairwise
FST varied from 0.02 to 0.18. Stickleback were divided into five genetic
clusters, with a single cluster comprising stickleback from Washington to
Alaska. Plate number, Eda, body shape, and candidate loci showed evidence
of being under selection in the marine environment. Comparisons to a
freshwater population demonstrated that candidate loci for freshwater
adaptation varied depending on the choice of marine populations.
Conclusions: Marine stickleback are structured into phenotypically and
genetically distinct populations that have been evolving as freshwater
stickleback evolved. This variation complicates their usefulness as
proxies of the ancestors of freshwater populations. Lessons from
stickleback may be applied to other "contemporary
ancestor"-derived population studies. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.450c2v7 |