Transition from transperitoneal to retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Team-based and individual learning curve: A cross-sectional study
Background: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is a standard practice for kidney donor transplantation due to fewer complications associated with the treatment. Retroperitoneal approach to LLDN is thought to be more advantageous in preventing injuries to various abdominal organs. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN) is a standard
practice for kidney donor transplantation due to fewer complications
associated with the treatment. Retroperitoneal approach to LLDN is thought
to be more advantageous in preventing injuries to various abdominal
organs. However, the transition process from transperitoneal to
retroperitoneal LLDN is important to ensure the best outcome for the
patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the learning curve for
the retroperitoneal approach in LLDN among urologists in an individual and
team-based approach Methods: A retrospective analysis of retroperitoneal
LLDN was performed on procedures performed by a kidney donor team
consisting of four (4) urologists from January 2019 to January 2022 at
Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Indonesia. The data were
taken from pre-existing medical records. The learning curve for the
operation time, warm ischemic time, and estimated blood loss were analyzed
using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Phase 1 represents the initial
learning curve, the phase 2 plateau represents the period of proficiency,
and phase 3 represents the mastery period. Results: A total of 127
retroperitoneal LLDN procedures were done during the study period by four
operators with various experience. The average procedure needed to achieve
proficiency was 16.5 procedures. Meanwhile, the average procedure needed
to achieve mastery was 28 procedures. A shorter learning curve was
achieved by operators with more experience in other laparoscopic
procedures. Conclusions: The learning curve for transition from
transperitoneal to retroperitoneal approach to LLDN is relatively short
and feasible for both individuals and teams of urologists. Therefore, the
transition to a retroperitoneal approach is a feasible option to reduce
the complication rate of LLDN. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.3tx95x6kq |