Opposing fitness consequences of habitat use in a harvested moose population
1. Landscape changes are happening at an unprecedented pace, and together with high levels of wildlife harvesting humans have a large effect on wildlife populations. A thorough knowledge of their combined influence on individual fitness is important in order to understand factors affecting populatio...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | 1. Landscape changes are happening at an unprecedented pace, and together
with high levels of wildlife harvesting humans have a large effect on
wildlife populations. A thorough knowledge of their combined influence on
individual fitness is important in order to understand factors affecting
population dynamics. 2. The goal of the study was to assess the individual
consistency in the use of risky habitat types, and how habitat use was
related to fitness components and life-history strategies. 3. Using data
from a closely monitored and harvested population of moose (Alces alces),
we examined how individual variation in offspring size, reproduction, and
survival was related to the use of open grasslands; a habitat type that
offers high-quality forage during summer, but at the cost of being more
exposed to hunters in autumn. Use of this habitat type may therefore
involve a trade-off between high mortality risk and forage maximization.
4. There was high repeatability in habitat use, which suggest consistent
behaviour within individuals. Offspring number and weight was positively
related to the mothers’ use of open grasslands, whereas the probability of
surviving the subsequent harvest season was negatively related to the use
of the same habitat type. As a consequence, we found a non-significant
relationship between habitat use and lifetime fitness. 5. The study
suggest that harvesting, even if intended to be nonselective with regard
to phenotypes, may be selective towards animals with specific behaviour
and life-history strategies. As a consequence, harvesting can alter the
life-history composition of the population and target life-history
strategies that would be beneficial for individual fitness and population
growth in the absence of hunting. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.31zcrjdh5 |