Data from: Diet variability among insular populations of Podarcis lizards reveals diverse strategies to face resource-limited environments
Access to resources is a dynamic and multi-causal process that determines the success and survival of a population. It is therefore often challenging to disentangle the factors affecting ecological traits like diet. Insular habitats provide a good opportunity to study how variation in diet originate...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Access to resources is a dynamic and multi-causal process that determines
the success and survival of a population. It is therefore often
challenging to disentangle the factors affecting ecological traits like
diet. Insular habitats provide a good opportunity to study how variation
in diet originates, in particular in populations of mesopredators such as
lizards. Indeed, high levels of population density associated with low
food abundance and low predation are selection pressures typically
observed on islands. In the present study, the diet of eighteen insular
populations of two closely related species of lacertid lizards (Podarcis
sicula and Podarcis melisellensis) was assessed. Our results reveal that
despite dietary variability among populations, diet taxonomic diversity is
not impacted by island area. In contrast, however, diet disparity metrics,
based on the variability in the physical (hardness) and behavioral
(evasiveness) properties of ingested food items, are correlated with
island size. These findings suggest that an increase in intraspecific
competition for access to resources may induce shifts in functional
components of the diet. Additionally, the two species differed in the
relation between diet disparity and island area suggesting that different
strategies exist to deal with low food abundance in these two species.
Finally, sexual dimorphism in diet and head dimensions is not greater on
smaller islands, in contrast to our predictions. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.2b1g52j |