Genomic diversity and population structure of teosintes (Zea spp.) and its conservation implications
The wild species of the genus Zea commonly named teosintes, comprise nine different taxa, distributed from northern Mexico to Costa Rica. Although this genus of plants has been extensively studied from a morphological, ecogeographical and genetic point of view, most contributions have been limited t...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The wild species of the genus Zea commonly named teosintes, comprise nine
different taxa, distributed from northern Mexico to Costa Rica. Although
this genus of plants has been extensively studied from a morphological,
ecogeographical and genetic point of view, most contributions have been
limited to the study of a few populations and taxa. To understand the
great variability that exists between and within teosinte species, it is
necessary to include the vast majority of known populations. In this
context, the objective of this work was to evaluate the diversity and
genomic structure of 276 teosinte populations. Molecular analyzes were
performed with 3,604 plants and with data from 33,929 SNPs. The levels of
genetic diversity by taxonomic group show a marked difference between
species, races and sections, where the highest values of genomic diversity
were found in ssp. parviglumis and ssp. mexicana. The lower values were
obtained for the Luxuriantes section as well as ssp. huehuetenagensis of
the section Zea. The results of the structure show that there is a great
genetic differentiation in all the taxonomic groups considered. For
ssp. parviglumis and mexicana, which are the taxa with the largest number
of populations, a marked genomic differentiation was found that is
consistent with their geographic distribution patterns. These results
showed a loss of diversity in several teosinte populations, making a
strong case for further collection, and ex situ and in situ conservation.
Also, this study highlights the importance of integrating genomic
diversity and structure for the applications of conservation and
management. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.2547d7wxp |