Data from: To call or not to call: parents assess the vulnerability of their young before warning them about predators
Communication about predators can reveal the effect of both conspecific and heterospecific audiences on signalling strategy, providing insight into signal function and animal cognition. In species that alarm call to their young, parents face a fundamental dilemma: calling can silence noisy offspring...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Communication about predators can reveal the effect of both conspecific
and heterospecific audiences on signalling strategy, providing insight
into signal function and animal cognition. In species that alarm call to
their young, parents face a fundamental dilemma: calling can silence noisy
offspring and so make them less likely to be overheard, but can also alert
predators that young are nearby. Parents could resolve this dilemma by
being sensitive to the current vulnerability of offspring, and calling
only when young are most at risk. Testing whether offspring vulnerability
affects parental strategy has proved difficult, however, because more
vulnerable broods are often also more valuable. We tested experimentally
whether parent white-browed scrubwren, Sericornis frontalis, assessed
brood noisiness when alarm calling. When a model predator was nearby,
parents gave more alarm calls when playbacks simulated noisy broods, yet
brood noisiness did not affect adult calling when only a control model was
present. Parents were therefore sensitive to the tradeoff between
silencing young and alerting predators to the presence of nests. Our study
demonstrates that receiver vulnerability can affect signalling decisions
in species other than primates. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.234d8 |