Quantifying and reducing cross-contamination in single- and multiplex hybridization capture of ancient DNA
The use of hybridization capture has enabled a massive upscaling in sample sizes for ancient DNA studies, allowing the analysis of hundreds of skeletal remains (Mathieson et al., 2015; Narasimhan et al., 2019) or sediments (Vernot et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Zavala et al., 2021) in single studi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The use of hybridization capture has enabled a massive upscaling in sample
sizes for ancient DNA studies, allowing the analysis of hundreds of
skeletal remains (Mathieson et al., 2015; Narasimhan et al., 2019) or
sediments (Vernot et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021; Zavala et al., 2021) in
single studies. Yet demands in throughput continue to grow, and
hybridization capture has become a limiting step in sample preparation due
to the large consumption of reagents, consumables and time. Here we
explore the possibility of improving the economics of sample preparation
via multiplex capture, i.e. the hybridization capture of pools of
double-indexed ancient DNA libraries. We demonstrate that this strategy is
feasible for small genomic targets, such as mitochondrial DNA, if the
annealing temperature is increased and PCR cycles are limited in
post-capture amplification to avoid index swapping by jumping PCR, which
manifests as cross-contamination in resulting sequence data. We also show
that the re-amplification of double-indexed libraries to PCR plateau
before or after hybridization capture can sporadically lead to small, but
detectable cross-contamination even if libraries are amplified in separate
reactions. We provide protocols for both manual capture and automated
capture in 384-well format that are compatible with single- and multiplex
capture and effectively suppress cross-contamination and artefact
formation. Last, we provide a simple computational method for quantifying
cross-contamination due to index swapping in double-indexed libraries,
which we recommend using for routine quality checks in studies that are
sensitive to cross-contamination. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.2280gb5t7 |