Convergence, parallelism, and function of extreme parietal callus in diverse groups of Cenozoic Gastropoda
We use SEM imaging to examine the shell microstructure of fossil and living species in five families of caenogastropods (Strombidae, Volutidae, Olividae, Pseudolividae, and Ancillariidae) to determine whether parallel or convergent evolution is responsible for the development of a unique caenogastro...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We use SEM imaging to examine the shell microstructure of fossil and
living species in five families of caenogastropods (Strombidae, Volutidae,
Olividae, Pseudolividae, and Ancillariidae) to determine whether parallel
or convergent evolution is responsible for the development of a unique
caenogastropod trait, the extreme parietal callus. The extreme parietal
callus is defined as a substantial thickening of both the spire callus and
the callus on the ventral shell surface such that it covers 50% or more of
the surface. Caenogastropods as a whole construct EPC convergently, using
a variety of low-density, poorly-organized microstructures that are
otherwise uncommon in caenogastropod non-callus shell construction. Within
clades, however, we see evidence for parallelism in decreased regulation
in both the shell and callus microstructure. Low density and
poorly-ordered microstructure -- such as used for EPC -- uses less organic
scaffolding and is less energetically expensive than normal shell
microstructure. This suggests EPC functions to rapidly and inexpensively
increase shell thickness and overall body size. Tests of functional
ecology suggest that EPC might function both to defend against crushing
predation through increased body size and dissipation of forces while
aiding in shell orientation of highly-mobile gastropods. These
interpretations hinge on the current phylogenetic placement of
caenogastropod families, emphasizing the essential contribution of
phylogeny when interpreting homoplasy. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.18931zctq |