Data from: Wildflower strips enhance pollination in adjacent strawberry crops at the small scale
Wildflower strips (WFS) are increasingly used to counteract the negative consequences of agricultural intensification. To date, it is poorly understood how WFS promote flower visitation and pollination services in nearby insect-pollinated crops. We therefore ask whether WFS enhance pollination servi...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Wildflower strips (WFS) are increasingly used to counteract the negative
consequences of agricultural intensification. To date, it is poorly
understood how WFS promote flower visitation and pollination services in
nearby insect-pollinated crops. We therefore ask whether WFS enhance
pollination service in adjacent strawberry crops, and how such an effect
depends on the distance from WFS. Over two years we examined the effects
of experimentally sown WFS compared to grassy strips on pollination
services in adjacent strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) crops across a total
of 19 study sites. Moreover, we examined flower visitation, species
richness and community composition of the most important insect pollinator
taxa at different within-field locations varying in distance to WFS. We
found increased pollination services at the edge of WFS compared to
locally reduced pollination services at the centre, which resulted in no
significant difference in seed set between WFS and control fields. Total
flower visits and species richness of pollinators were higher in WFS than
in adjacent strawberry fields. Moreover, wild bee visitation was enhanced
in adjacent strawberry crops near WFS compared to field centres, and
intermediate at field edges near grassy strips. Our study demonstrates
that diverse WFS can increase wild bee visitation and pollination services
in the field edges of adjacent strawberry crops, but that overall
visitation and pollination services do not increase. Moreover, our
findings show that major pollinator taxa exhibit distinct responses,
resulting in a shift of pollinator community composition as a function of
distance to WFS with direct effects on crop pollination. Our results that
WFS enhance rather than reduce crop pollination services near WFS should
distract possible concerns by farmers that WFS may locally absorb rather
than export crop pollinators. Considering the spatial restricted
enhancement of wild bees and associated pollination services we suggest to
establish WFS in the centre of crop fields. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.5061/dryad.0js540s |