Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models - Data files
Data from publication:Briscoe, N., Elith, J., Salguero-Gomez, R, Lahoz-Monfort, J., Camac, J., Giljohann, K., Holden, M., Hradsky, B., Kearney, M, McMahon, S., Phillips, B., Regan, T., Rhodes, J., Vesk, P., Wintle, B., Yen, J., Guillera-Arroita, G. (Accepted). Forecasting species range dynamics with...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Data from publication:Briscoe, N., Elith, J., Salguero-Gomez, R, Lahoz-Monfort, J., Camac, J., Giljohann, K., Holden, M., Hradsky, B., Kearney, M, McMahon, S., Phillips, B., Regan, T., Rhodes, J., Vesk, P., Wintle, B., Yen, J., Guillera-Arroita, G. (Accepted). Forecasting species range dynamics with process-explicit models: matching methods to applications, Ecology Letters Primary contact: Natalie Briscoe (nbriscoe@unimelb.edu.au)Files included in data package: Process_explicit_range_dynamics_review.csv Population_replication_COMADRE_and_COMPADRE.csvDATA INFORMATIONFile 1: Process_explicit_range_dynamics_review.csvDescription: Data from review of how process-explicit models have been used in ecology and biodiversity management including study taxa and research focus (summarized in Fig. 3). See Appendix SA1 of manuscript for details of methods and further explanations/definitions.Variables:Paper = Paper information (citation)Model.class = Model class for which assessed (one of: Occupancy dynamics, Individual based model (IBM), Coupled SDM-population, Eco-physiological, Demographic distribution, Abundance dynamics) Plants = were plant species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Birds = were bird species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Mammals = were mammal species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Fish = were fish species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Reptile.Amphibian = were reptile or amphibian species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes) Inverts = were invertebrate species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Other = were other species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Virtual = were virtual species modelled (0=No, 1=Yes)Method.Development = Did the research focus on demonstrating or refining new method (0= No, 1 = Yes)Climate.change.Weather = Did the research aim to look at effect of changes in weather/climate (0= No, 1 = Yes)Landscape.Dynamics = Did the research aim to look at effect of changes in land-use/landscape dynamics (0= No, 1 = Yes)Extinction.Risk = Did the research focus on conservation - predicting extinction risk (0= No, 1 = Yes)Key.Habitat = Did the research focus on conservation - identifying key habitat (0= No, 1 = Yes) Potential.Range.Invasives = Did the research focus on invasive species - potential range (0= No, 1 = Yes) Spread.Invasives = Did the research focus on invasive species - spread (0= No, 1 = Yes) Eval.Outputs.New.Data = Were model outputs quantitatively evaluated against new data (i.e. data not used fitting the model?) (0= No, 1 = Yes)File2: Population_replication_COMADRE_and_COMPADRE.csvDescription: Data Av |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.26188/5d146fcceaea1 |