Data from: Dermal denticle assemblages in coral reef sediments correlate with conventional shark surveys
It is challenging to assess long-term trends in mobile, long-lived, and relatively rare species such as sharks. Despite ongoing declines in many coastal shark populations, conventional surveys might be too fleeting and too recent to describe population trends over decades to millennia. Placing recen...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | It is challenging to assess long-term trends in mobile, long-lived, and
relatively rare species such as sharks. Despite ongoing declines in many
coastal shark populations, conventional surveys might be too fleeting and
too recent to describe population trends over decades to millennia.
Placing recent shark declines into historical context should improve
management efforts as well as our understanding of past ecosystem
dynamics. A new paleoecological approach for surveying shark abundance on
coral reefs is to quantify dermal denticle assemblages preserved in
sediments. This approach assumes that denticle accumulation rates
correlate with shark abundances. Here, we test this assumption by
comparing the denticle record in surface sediments to three conventional
shark survey methods at Palmyra Atoll, Line Islands, central Pacific
Ocean, where shark density is high and spatially heterogeneous. We
generally found a significant positive correlation between denticle
accumulation rates and shark abundances derived from underwater visual
census, baited remote underwater video, and hook and line surveys.
Denticle accumulation rates reflected shark abundances, suggesting that
denticle assemblages can preserve a signal of time-averaged shark
abundance in low-energy coral reef environments. We offer suggestions for
applying this tool to measure shark abundance over long timescales in
other contexts. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.25349/d9cp4c |