Healthy beverage initiatives: A case study of scenarios for optimizing their environmental benefits on a university campus
The association between consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) and diseases including diabetes, liver disease and dental disease is well known, yet SSBs continue to be aggressively promoted, including on university campuses. Healthy beverage initiatives (HBIs) are focused on improving healt...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The association between consumption of sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs)
and diseases including diabetes, liver disease and dental disease is well
known, yet SSBs continue to be aggressively promoted, including on
university campuses. Healthy beverage initiatives (HBIs) are focused on
improving health by decreasing consumption of SSBs. Some HBIs also aim to
improve environmental sustainability, e.g. by substituting tap water for
SSBs, including the HBI on the 10 campuses of the University of
California. However, there is no study of HBIs’ potential environmental
benefits. To address this knowledge gap we carried out an environmental
life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, blue water use, and
plastic pollution for both liquid content and container for the 940,773
liters of beverages consumed in one calendar year at the University of
California, Santa Barbara. We found that climate and water impacts per
liter for liquid contents of 10 SSB beverage types and the non-SSB
versions of these 10 types without added sugar, were very similar and
larger than that of the containers. Impacts of six container types varied
widely, with climate impact highest for glass, and blue water and plastic
impact highest for plastic containers, while aluminum had higher climate
impact than plastic. We then evaluated the environmental benefits of 12
counterfactual HBI scenarios with different combinations of container
types and liquid beverages for SSBs, non-SSBs, bottled water, and tap
water. The scenario that replaced all other beverages with tap water
eliminated almost all environmental impacts, while scenarios that reduced
SSBs but increased beverages other than tap water took back many benefits
of reduced SSBs. Our results show that to optimize potential environmental
benefits, HBIs need to emphasize reducing consumption of all commercial
beverages and replacing them with tap water, which will also optimize
health benefits. Our methods and results will be valuable for higher
education, other institutions, and communities seeking to maximize both
health and environmental benefits of healthy beverage policies. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.25349/d98k65 |