Data from: Limit feeding TMR exacerbates intersucking in year-old dairy heifers
Limit feeding is a practice that is used to improve feed efficiency and control growth in dairy heifers, but also has negative consequences associated with hunger and restriction of feeding behavior. One such consequence could be intersucking (i.e., the licking or sucking of another animal’s teats o...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Limit feeding is a practice that is used to improve feed efficiency and
control growth in dairy heifers, but also has negative consequences
associated with hunger and restriction of feeding behavior. One such
consequence could be intersucking (i.e., the licking or sucking of another
animal’s teats or udder). This behavior is reported to varying degrees in
heifers, and thus, our first objective was to evaluate whether
intersucking increased in response to short-term (48 h) feed restriction.
Intersucking interventions, such as nose rings, are often applied to
specific animals, and so our second objective was to describe intersucking
performance in individual heifers, including those that represent outliers
in this population. We studied 42 heifers (9 Jerseys, 33 Holsteins) aged
12.8 ± 1.1 mo (mean ± SD). They were housed in 21 pairs, the experimental
unit for our first objective. We used a switchback design with 3 periods
of 2 d each where heifers were fed ad libitum total mixed ration in the
first and third periods (Baseline and Return, respectively), and limit fed
to 50% of ad libitum intake in the second period (Restriction). We scored
time spent intersucking continuously and eating at 5-min intervals from
video recordings from 0800 to 2000 h on 4 d (baseline d 2, restriction d
2, return d 1, and return d 2). Heifer pairs spent less time eating (16 ±
0.4% mean percentage of 12-h observations ± SE), more time intersucking
(27 ± 7 s/12 h), and engaged in longer bouts of intersucking (23 ± 5
s/bout) on Restriction d 2 compared with all other days (eating: 34.7 ±
1.1%, 44.2 ± 0.9%, 35.8 ± 1.1% of 12-h; intersucking time: 7 ± 2, 7 ± 3,
10 ± 5 s/12 h; intersucking bout length: 3 ± 1, 2 ± 1, 3 ± 1 s/bout;
Baseline d 2, Return d 1, Return d 2, respectively). There was no
difference in the number of bouts of intersucking across days (1.3 ±0.2
bouts/12 h). The drop in eating during feed restriction was followed by a
rebound on Return d 1 before returning to baseline levels. Time spent
intersucking did not differ among ad libitum periods. Overall, 90% of the
heifers performed intersucking on at least 1 of the 4 d, and did this for
1 to 127 s/12 h (range) in 1 to 13 bouts/12 h. Of the heifers that
intersucked, 55% did this at extreme levels relative to the rest of the
experimental population (outliers). Solid feed restriction exacerbated
intersucking in year-old heifers, but this behavior was widespread. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.25338/b8wk9t |