Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on rehabilitation patients with spinal cord injury
Figure A and B:A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treat...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Dataset |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Figure A and B:A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and1 month after treatment(P0.05), butthere was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P0.01).B: ▲:Comparison of the total FIM scores of the treatment group before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total FIM scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the control group before and after treatmentin1, 2 and 3 months(P0.01).Data expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM)Figure CThe modified Barthel Indexaccording to FIM scale was correlated with the total score of PTSD, and the data was expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM) * P 0.05, * * P 0.01. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.21227/t1yv-j507 |