Effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on rehabilitation patients with spinal cord injury

Figure A and B:A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gang, Huang, Bin-Lai, Lin, Jian-Hui, Hu, Wen-Ya, Zhang, Fu-Hua, Qiu, Zhi-Liang, Zhang, Hong, Fan, Min, Lu, Jiang-Bo, Li
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Figure A and B:A:▲:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the treatment group within before and after1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total PTSD scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Look at the control group, there was no significant difference between before treatment and1 month after treatment(P0.05), butthere was significant difference in the 2 months after treatment(P0.05), and the difference was more significant in the 3 months after treatment(P0.01).B: ▲:Comparison of the total FIM scores of the treatment group before and after 1, 2 and 3 months treatment(P0.01).▼:Comparison of total FIM scores between treatment group and control group(P0.01).■:Comparison of total PTSD scores of the control group before and after treatmentin1, 2 and 3 months(P0.01).Data expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM)Figure CThe modified Barthel Indexaccording to FIM scale was correlated with the total score of PTSD, and the data was expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM) * P 0.05, * * P 0.01.
DOI:10.21227/t1yv-j507