COMPARISON OF SINGLE-INCISION MIDURETHRAL SLING AND LAPAROSCOPIC BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION TECHNIQUES IN TERMS OF SURGICAL EFFECT AND SIDE EFFECT IN GENUINE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY

COMPARISON OF SINGLE-INCISION MIDURETHRAL SLING AND LAPAROSCOPIC BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION TECHNIQUES IN TERMS OF SURGICAL EFFECT AND SIDE EFFECT IN GENUINE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY

COMPARISON OF SINGLE-INCISION MIDURETHRAL SLING AND LAPAROSCOPIC BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION TECHNIQUES IN TERMS OF SURGICAL EFFECT AND SIDE EFFECT IN GENUINE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY Various retropubic and midurethral sling techniques have shown high cure rates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Yakup Kumtepe
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:COMPARISON OF SINGLE-INCISION MIDURETHRAL SLING AND LAPAROSCOPIC BURCH COLPOSUSPENSION TECHNIQUES IN TERMS OF SURGICAL EFFECT AND SIDE EFFECT IN GENUINE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY Various retropubic and midurethral sling techniques have shown high cure rates in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Our aim in this study is to compare the effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and surgical results of single-incision midurethral sling (SIMS), defined as the third-generation midurethral sling, and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) procedures in patients undergoing surgical treatment due to SUI.TEZ VERİLERİ (1).xlsx
DOI:10.17632/tfwzc7bvbv.1