Data for: Fiscal Devaluation and Economic Activity in the EU

Our sample covers the 27 EU countries over the years 1995 - 2014. To measure FD, we use a ratio of revenue from ESSC to revenue from VAT, as Bosca et al. (2013) proposed. We use the variable either as non-cyclically adjusted (FDit) or cyclically adjusted (Cyclical_ FDit) ratios. We filter out the cy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Cizkowicz, Piotr
Format: Dataset
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Our sample covers the 27 EU countries over the years 1995 - 2014. To measure FD, we use a ratio of revenue from ESSC to revenue from VAT, as Bosca et al. (2013) proposed. We use the variable either as non-cyclically adjusted (FDit) or cyclically adjusted (Cyclical_ FDit) ratios. We filter out the cyclical component, applying EC (2014) methodology. The data come from the Eurostat and EC AMECO. We use five different dependent variables in the models: domestic value added in gross exports (VAXit). To cover the entire period under consideration, we combine the datasets from two World Input-Output Database tables (for the years 1995 – 2010 and 2010 – 2014, respectively). However, to allow comparisons with other empirical studies, we also examine the effects of FD on net exports (NXit). We take the relevant data from Eurostat. We consider also growth of GDP (GDPit), employment (EMPLit) and labour compensation per employee (WAGEit), respectively. We take the data on GDP and employment growth from Eurostat, and the data on labour costs per employee from OECD. To analyse factors that, according to the theoretical literature, may cause FD effects to differ across countries and time, we first consider membership in the Eurozone (EURO), defined as a binary variable, which assigns the value of 1 to years of membership of a given country in the monetary union and zero otherwise. Second, we take into account the trade openness of an economy (OPEN). It is measured as a sum of exports and imports in relation to GDP. The data come from Eurostat. Finally, we envisage some labour market institutions that could affect wage rigidities or labour supply elasticity. Thus, we use indices of a predominant level at which wage bargaining takes place (level) and of centralisation of wage bargaining (cwb), respectively. We take them from Visser's ICTWSS database (version 5.1 updated in September 2016.) In turn, responsiveness of employment to shocks is found to depend, in particular, on tax wedge and generosity of unemployment benefits. As a measure of generosity of unemployment benefits we use net replacement rates for: (i) single workers (NRR_single) and (ii) couples with a single earner and with two children (NRR_couple), earning an average salary in the economy. There is no single source of data on net unemployment replacement rates covering all EU countries for the entire period considered. Thus, we combine the Vliet and Caminada database (Version 1.0 updated in January 2012) that
DOI:10.17632/kwpy9kh64m